期刊文献+

腹腔镜微创手术治疗宫颈癌患者的临床应用效果及安全性分析

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜微创手术治疗宫颈癌患者的临床应用效果及安全性。方法:对我院在2015年7月-2018年8月接收的100例宫颈癌患者临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据不同的治疗方安案将100例患者分为对照组、试验组,每组50例样本。对照组行开腹手术治疗,试验组行腹腔镜微创手术治疗,对比手术相关指标、术后相关指标、并发症发生率。结果:手术时间、术后排气时间、术后体温恢复时间、术后留置导尿管时间、术后抗生素应用时间与对照组相比,试验组较短,P<0.05(统计学有意义);术中出血量、盆腔引流量与对照组相比,试验组较少,P<0.05(统计学有意义);淋巴结淋除数量与对照组相比,试验组较多,P<0.05(统计学有意义);术后24小时HGB减少量、并发症发生率与对照组相比,试验组较低,P<0.05(统计学有意义)。结论:宫颈癌患者采用腹腔镜微创手术治疗,不仅可以改善手术相关指标、术后相关指标,还可以减少并发症发生率,临床应用价值较高。
出处 《黑龙江中医药》 2019年第3期126-128,共3页 Heilongjiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1李淑红.腹腔镜微创治疗与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的临床探析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2014,6(3):62-64. 被引量:6
  • 2Yan X, Li G, Shang H, et al. Twelve-year experience with laparo- scopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in cer- vical cancer [ J ].Gynecol Oncol, 2011,120:362-367.
  • 3Phanida J, Kuan-Gen H, Doris RB, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer [J].Gynecol Minimal Invas Ther, 2013,2:42-47.
  • 4Long Y, Yao DS, Pan XW, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a sys- temic review and meta- analysis [J].PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): 94116.
  • 5Xu L, Sun FQ, Wang ZH. Radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer: a system- atic review[ J ].Acta Obste Gynecol Scand,2011,90:1200-1209.
  • 6Lu Q, Zhang Y, Wang S, et al. Neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemo- therapy followed by total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in stage IB 1 cervical cancer [ J ].Fertil Steril, 2014,101:812-817.
  • 7Sebastein G, Philippe M, Fabrice N, et al. Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET[J].Lancet Oncol, 2012,13:e212-220.
  • 8Escobar PF, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, et al. Comparison of sin- gle-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer [J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(5):1583-1588.
  • 9Du XL, Sheng XG, Jiang T, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as guidance for radical trachelectomy in young patients with early stage cervical cancer [ J ].BMC Cancer, 2011,11:157.
  • 10Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, et al. Surgical outcome of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus convention- al multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer[J].Yon- sei Med J, 2014,55(5): 1222-1230.

共引文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部