期刊文献+

高速公路单向双车道车辆群行车风险度量研究 被引量:7

Study on Driving Risk Measurement for Two-lane Freeway Vehicle Group
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨局部车辆流的安全性及其对道路安全性的影响,从“车辆群”的角度研究了高速公路行车风险度量。提出了高速公路单向双车道“车辆群”范围的划分方法;分析了“车辆群”内可能存在的侧向碰撞、侧面刮擦、追尾碰撞等冲突类型,针对各冲突类型选取了“车辆群”风险度量的碰撞时间TTC和后侵入时间PET这2个指标,提出了双车道“车辆群”行车风险度量模型,并用VISSIM对模型进行了仿真分析。结果表明:由于车辆换道的影响,双车道“车辆群”并不仅仅是两个单车道相邻车辆的对应合并;对道路上的车辆流进行“车辆群”划分后再评估车辆的行车风险,可以缩小道路上潜在危险区域的排查范围,提高高速公路行车风险识别效率;出现冲突风险警告的“车辆群”内车辆速度的偏差程度远远大于其他的“车辆群”,从而验证了模型的有效性。 To find out how local vehicle flow influences road safety,a driving risk measurement was done for two-lane freeway vehicles by means of vehicle group.A method for the range of vehicle-group was proposed to analyze such possible conflicts as lateral collision,side scraping,rear-end collision.Reasonable measurement index for each was selected for the driving-risk measurement model of the two-lane highway based on time-to-collision(TTC)and post encroachment time(PET).The model s feasibility was finally confirmed with a case study of VISSIM simulation.The results show that,according to the vehicles lane-changing behaviors,the two-lane vehicle group is not just a merge of the opposite vehicles on a two-lane freeway,that evaluating its driving risk can shorten the check of the potential area,improve its risk identification,and that the risk warning for deviation of running speeds through velocity analysis is far greater than others,which proves the efficiency of the model.
作者 容颖 温惠英 赵胜 RONG Ying;WEN Huiying;ZHAO Sheng(School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,Guangdong,P.R.China)
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第9期95-100,121,共7页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51578247 51378222)
关键词 交通工程 高速公路 行车风险度量 碰撞时间 后侵入时间 traffic engineering freeway driving risk measurement time-to-collision(TTC) post encroachment time(PET)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1袁泉,李一兵,梅冰松.汽车撞行人和骑自行车人事故特征参数对比研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2005,3(3):92-99. 被引量:5
  • 2庞加斌,王达磊,陈艾荣,林志兴.桥面侧风对行车安全性影响的概率评价方法[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(4):59-64. 被引量:38
  • 3WOLFRAM S. Statistical mechanics of cellular automata[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1983, 55(3): 601-644.
  • 4NAGEL K, SCHRECKENBERG M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic[J]. Journal of Physics, 1992, 2(12): 2221-2229.
  • 5CHOWDHURY D, SANTEN L, SCHADSCHNEIDER A. Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems[J]. Physics Reports, 2000, 329(4): 199-329.
  • 6MAERIVOET S, DE MOOR B. Cellular automata models of road traffic[J]. Physics Reports, 2005, 419(1): 1-64.
  • 7RICKERT M, NAGEL K, SCHRECKENBERG M, et al. Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 1996, 231(4): 534-550.
  • 8CHOWDHURY D, WOLF D E, SCHRECKENBERG M. Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: Effects of lane-changing rules[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 1997, 235(3): 417-439.
  • 9NAGEL K, WOLF D E, WAGNER P, et al. Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: a systematic approach[J]. Physical Review E, 1998, 58(2): 1425-1437.
  • 10JIA Bin, JIANG Rui, WU Qingsong, et al. Honk effect in the two-lane cellular automaton model for traffic flow[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2005, 348(3): 544-552.

共引文献37

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部