期刊文献+

对比子宫瘢痕妊娠中清宫术与宫腹腔镜联用的效果

Comparison of the Effect of Uterine Curettage Combined with Laparoscopic Surgery on Uterine Scar Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析子宫瘢痕妊娠中联合应用清宫术、宫腹腔镜的临床效果。方法选择该院于2018年4-12月期间收治的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者70例,借助计算机随机分组的方式,将患者划分为联合组(35例患者)以及清宫术组(35例患者),清宫术组患者接受宫腔镜下清宫术治疗,联合组患者在基于对照组患者治疗方案同时被施以腹腔镜引导下的子宫动脉栓塞术治疗,比对两组患者的临床治疗指标,包括术中出血量、阴道流血时间、血β-HCG恢复正常时间以及住院时间。结果联合组患者的术中出血量为(69.12±7.23)mL,阴道流血时间(5.10±1.46)d,血β-HCG恢复正常时间(19.45±5.23)d,住院时间(7.56±2.12)d;清宫术组患者的术中出血量为(107.54±9.76)mL,阴道流血时间(7.86±2.31)d,血-HCGβ恢复正常时间(28.78±7.75)d,住院时间(14.65±2.76)d;两组患者的相应数据比较,组间差异有统计学意义(t=18.713、5.975、5.904、12.052,P<0.05)。结论在子宫瘢痕妊娠临床治疗期间,联合应用宫腔镜下清宫术与腹腔镜子宫动脉栓塞术,效果确切,而且可以加快患者康复,临床应对此进行推广、使用。 Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of combined application of uterine curettage and laparoscopic surgery on uterine s car pregnancy. Methods Seventy patients with uterine scar pregnancy admitted to our hospital from April to December 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into the combined group(35 patients)and the curettage group(35 patients) by computerization. Patients in the curettage group received hysteroscopic uterine curettage, and patients in the combined group were treated with laparoscopically guided uterine artery embolization based on the treatment plan of the control group. The clinical treatment indicators of the two groups, including intraoperative blood loss, vaginal bleeding time, blood-HCG recovery time and hospitalization time were compared. Results In the combined group, the intraoperative blood loss was(69.12±7.23)mL, vaginal bleeding time was(5.10±1.46) d, bloodHCG recovery time was(19.45±5.23)d, hospitalization time was(7.56±2.12)d. In the curettage group, the intraoperative blood loss was(107.54±9.76)mL, vaginal bleeding time(7.86±2.31)d, blood-HCG returning to normal time(28.78±7.75)d, hospitalization time(14.65 ±2.76)d. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t =18.713,5.975, 5.904, 12.052, P<0.05). Conclusion During the clinical treatment of uterine scar pregnancy, the effect of combined use of uterine curettage and laparoscopic uterine artery embolization is significant, which can accelerate the recovery of patients, and is worthy of the clinical promotion.
作者 马艳霞 MA Yan-xia(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinxiang Hongda Hospital,Jining,Shandong Province,272000 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2019年第15期131-133,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 子宫瘢痕妊娠 清宫术 子宫动脉栓塞术 术中出血量 住院时间 Uterine scar pregnancy Curettage Uterine artery embolization Intraoperative blood loss Hospitalization time
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献96

  • 1Vial Y,Petignat P,Hohlfeld P.Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J].U ltrosound Obstet Gynecol,2010,6(6):592-593.
  • 2邓清华,邓伟雄,李仁河,等.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫疤痕妊娠的临床有效性和安全性[J].延边医学上,2014,19(138):60-61.
  • 3Li YR, Xiao SS, Wan YJ, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of three treat- merit options for cesarean scar pregnancy management [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2014,40( 11 ) :2146 - 2151.
  • 4Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section[J]. Fertil Steril, 2008,89(4) :974 -980.
  • 5Huang Y, Li YF, Xi RK, eta/. An application of uterine artery' chemo- embolization in treating cesarean scar pregnancy [ J ]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8 ( 2 ) :2570 - 2577.
  • 6Mueller PR, Mauro MA, Ray C. Uterine artery emboliization: state of the art[ J]. Semin Interv Radiol,2004,21 ( 1 ) :37.
  • 7Lui MW ,Shek NW ,Li RH ,et aL Management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy by repeated transvaginal uhrasonographic-guided aspi- ration with successful preservation of normal intrauterine p~gnancy and complicated by arteriovenous malformation [J]. Eur J Obstet Gy- necol Reprod Biol,2014,175 (1) :209.
  • 8杨清,朴曙花,王光伟,王玉.宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠64例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2010,45(2):89-92. 被引量:136
  • 9谭爱香,郭春,黄薇.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠46例临床疗效分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2011,27(3):211-213. 被引量:81
  • 10梁宝权,郑艾,李春梅.203例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2011,27(5):391-393. 被引量:98

共引文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部