期刊文献+

优化急诊护理流程在急诊胸痛患者抢救中的应用效果分析

The Application of the Optimized Emergency Nursing Process in the Rescue of Patients with Emergency Chest Pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探析优化急诊护理流程在急诊胸痛患者抢救中应用价值。方法:2018.02-2019.02,对本院接诊的72名急诊胸痛患者患者展开实验,按数字随机分为X组和Y组,X组采用常规护理,Y组采用优化急诊流程护理,通过抢救成功患者占比、急救时间和和住院时间三个指标对比评价X组与Y组治疗效果的差异。结果:Y组抢救成功实验者占比为97.22%,显著高于X组(抢救成功实验者占比为83.33%);Y组急救时间和和住院时间均显著优于X组(P<0.05)。结论:优化急诊护理流程在急诊胸痛患者抢救中应用价值较高,值得在临床上推广应用。 Objective: to explore the value of optimizing emergency nursing procedure in emergency chest pain patients. Methods: 72 patients with emergency chest pain were randomly divided into group X and group Y according to the number. Group X was treated with routine nursing, group Y was treated with optimized emergency process nursing, and group Y was treated with optimized emergency process nursing. The difference of treatment effect between group X and group Y was evaluated by the proportion of successful patients, first aid time and hospitalization time. Results: The percentage of successful rescue experimenters in group Y was 97.22%, significantly higher than that in group X(83.33%);the first aid time and hospitalization time in group Y were significantly better than those in group X(P<0.05). Conclusion: The application value of the optimized emergency nursing process in the rescue of emergency patients with chest pain is high, and it is worth to be popularized and applied clinically.
作者 陈攀
出处 《医学食疗与健康》 2019年第10期1-1,共1页 Medical Diet and Health
关键词 优化急诊护理流程 急诊胸痛患者 抢救 Optimize emergency nursing process Emergency chest pain patients Rescue
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1王一镗.严重创伤救治的策略——损伤控制性手术[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(1):32-35. 被引量:264
  • 2孙志扬,刘中民,唐伦先,刘建军,陈国庭,李侠,刘养洲,崔世涛,许国强.一体化的创伤急诊模式在突发灾害事故急救中的优越性[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(7):549-551. 被引量:54
  • 3Fang J, Alderman MH, Keenan NL, et al. Acute myocardial infarction hospitalization in the united states [ J ]. Am J Med, 2010 ; 123 ( 2 ) : 259-266.
  • 4Canadian cardiovascular society, American academy of family physicians, American college of cardiology, American heart association, 2007 focused update of the acc/aha,2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol , 2008:51(2) :210-247.
  • 5Liem SS, Hoeven BL, Oemrawsingh PV, et al. Optimization of acute and chronic care for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am Heart J,2007 ;153( 1 ) :11.
  • 6Pcat collaborators. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous shambolic therapy for acute myocardial in- farction: six month follow up and analysis of individual patient data form randomized trials [ J ]. Am heart J, 2003 ; 145( 1 ) :48-57.
  • 7Nissen SE. Brush JE Jr, Krumholz HM. President's page: gap-D 2 B : an alliance for quality [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006 ;48(9) : 1911-1912.
  • 8D'souza SP, Mamas MA, Fraser DG, et al. Routine early coronary angioplasty versus ischemia-guided angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a meta - analysis [ J]. Eur Heart J, 2011 ; 32 (8) :972-982.
  • 9Sanchez PL, Fernandez-aviles F. Routine early coronary angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction:lysis is not the final step [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2011 ;32 ( 8 ) :927-930.
  • 10Wang YB, Fu XH, Wang XC, et al. Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with stemi undergoing early pci following intravenous thrombolysis [ J ]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2012 ; 24 ( 8 ) : 412-416.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部