摘要
“康党”以“大陆新儒家”为名义而自居。以“新康有为主义”的“政治儒学”及“儒教”面目集体亮相,反对近代及港台新儒家的“心性儒学”。以“民族主义”的方式回到“传统”,罔顾现代性与全球化的现实。而其立论根据则是崇“经学”抑哲学,从而陷入吊诡之中。康党于经学犹重《春秋》,罔顾其他经典,尤其是《易经》作为群经之首的作用。本文认为,儒家当务之急并非忙着“创教”“干政”而要首先以《易经》为首实现儒家自身的“正本清源”,否则仍将陷入罪丘的历史怪状与循环之中。
Kang' s Party take themselves as Continental neo-Confucianism. They show up with new Kang Youwei' s thoughts and Confucianism religion and oppose to “Confucian mind” of modern Hongkong and Taiwan neo-Confucianism. They go back to tradition through nationalism and ignore modernization and globalization. Their theory foundation is study of Confucian classics rather than philosophy which lead to paradox. Kang' s Party pay much attention to Chun Qiu and ignore other classics, especially the leadership of Yi. We think Confucian scholars should radically reform to Confucianism itself leaded by Yi rather than creating religion and taking part into politics. This will lead to historical phenomenon and circle of blaming Confucius.
出处
《济南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2019年第5期60-69,158,共11页
Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition