重新仲裁立法例略考

Legislative Patterns of Remission of Arbitral Awards

由于不同国家对于重新仲裁制度的认识和定性不同,其立法例通常呈现多样态势。有的国家立法不承认重新仲裁,有的将其定位为提出仲裁裁决异议的后果之一,有的将其定位为提出仲裁裁决异议的方式之一。我国现有立法将其归类为提出仲裁裁决异议的后果之一,且属于异议程序中的重新仲裁。立法例的梳理及我国立法例定位的确定,有助于构建符合我国法制环境的重新仲裁的具体制度。

There are various legislative patterns of remission of arbitral awards due to the different views on the nature of it.Remission of arbitral awards is not included by some statutes.However,some statutes regard it as one of the consequences after an application for setting aside,others view it as availability of a separate remedy before state courts.As far as Chinese laws are concerned,remission is classified as one of the consequences after an application for setting aside and the setting aside proceedings should be suspended.Chinese legislative pattern is discerned from the comparative perspective and local circumstance,which will benefit the establishment of some specific systems,such as the deciders of revision,grounds for revision and etc.