摘要
我国刑事缺席审判程序对反腐败国际追逃追赃具有重要意义,但同时在程序启动条件的成就、证明标准的严格与区分、判决结果的承认与执行等方面面临多种障碍。为此,需要立法机关加快跟上国际刑事司法人权准则的步伐,修改完善相应规范制度,案件的调查、侦查机关要切实履行国际刑事司法准则义务,严格规范刑事诉讼行为,司法机关在具体适用刑事缺席审判程序的时,需要保持与特别没收程序的兼容性与独立性,根据实际情况,做出合理有效选择。
China's criminal default trial procedure is of great significance to the international anticorruption, fugitive repatriation and asset recovery. But at the same time, it faces many obstacles in terms of the achievement of the starting conditions of the procedure, the strictness and distinction of the standard of proof, and the recognition and enforcement of the judgment results. Therefore, it is necessary for the legislature to speed up the pace of keeping up with the international criminal justice human rights norms, modify and improve the corresponding normative system. The investigatory apparatus should earnestly fulfill their obligations under the international criminal justice norms and strictly regulate the criminal procedure. When applying the criminal default trial procedure, the judicial branches should maintain compatibility and independence with the special confiscation procedure, and make reasonable and effective choices according to actual situation.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2019年第3期24-29,共6页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
刑事缺席审判
程序启动
证明
承认与执行
criminal trial by default
procedure startup
proof
recognition and enforcement