期刊文献+

Simulated Effects of U.S. Withdrawal from Paris Agreement under Four Scenarios

Simulated Effects of U.S. Withdrawal from Paris Agreement under Four Scenarios
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Under the Paris Agreement framework, many developing countries call for low-carbon technology transfers from developed countries as a critical element in the global partnership for carbon emissions abatement. Such a partnership may be disrupted as the U.S. walks away from the agreement. Based on CIECIA-TD model, this paper examines effects of the U.S. exit on global low-carbon technology transfers under various scenarios and simulates the effects on low-carbon technology transfer, climate change, countries' emissions abatement results, and economic development. Our findings suggest that lowcarbon technology has significant emissions abatement and temperature rise mitigation effects. Low-carbon technology transfer among developed countries offers huge emissions abatement potentials, but patent protection system presents a significant barrier to further carbon emissions abatement. In this sense, the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement will significantly impede developed countries' carbon emissions abatement through technology transfer. With limited knowhow, R&D and learning capacity, developing countries will suffer more to cut carbon emissions under the chain effects of a more challenging technology sharing environment that may result from the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement. As a gradualist emissions abatement approach, low-carbon technology transfer cannot reduce emissions substantially within a short time, but its climate welfare is conducive to global economic growth and of great significance to carbon governance. Under the Paris Agreement framework, many developing countries call for low-carbon technology transfers from developed countries as a critical element in the global partnership for carbon emissions abatement. Such a partnership may be disrupted as the U.S. walks away from the agreement. Based on CIECIA-TD model, this paper examines effects of the U.S. exit on global low-carbon technology transfers under various scenarios and simulates the effects on low-carbon technology transfer, climate change, countries’ emissions abatement results, and economic development. Our findings suggest that lowcarbon technology has significant emissions abatement and temperature rise mitigation effects. Low-carbon technology transfer among developed countries offers huge emissions abatement potentials, but patent protection system presents a significant barrier to further carbon emissions abatement. In this sense, the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement will significantly impede developed countries’ carbon emissions abatement through technology transfer. With limited knowhow, R&D and learning capacity, developing countries will suffer more to cut carbon emissions under the chain effects of a more challenging technology sharing environment that may result from the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement. As a gradualist emissions abatement approach, low-carbon technology transfer cannot reduce emissions substantially within a short time, but its climate welfare is conducive to global economic growth and of great significance to carbon governance.
作者 Gu Gaoxiang Wang Zheng 顾高翔;王铮(Institute of Population Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China;Institute of Science and Technology Policy and Management Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, Shanghai)
出处 《China Economist》 2019年第5期41-53,共13页 中国经济学人(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Study on Regional Carbon Governance for China’s Response to Climate Change under the Effect of Global Economic Integration, Project Code: 41501130
关键词 PARIS AGREEMENT low-carbon technology transfer carbon emissions ABATEMENT nationally determined contributions(NDC) integrated assessment model Paris Agreement low-carbon technology transfer carbon emissions abatement nationally determined contributions(NDC) integrated assessment model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1DING ZhongLi1, DUAN XiaoNan2, GE QuanSheng3 & ZHANG ZhiQiang4 1 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China,2 The General Office of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China,3 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,4 The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library, the Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, Lanzhou 730000, China.Control of atmospheric CO_2 concentrations by 2050: A calculation on the emission rights of different countries[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2009,52(10):1447-1469. 被引量:50
  • 2刘启华,樊飞,戈海军,许丙胜.技术科学发展与产业结构变迁相关性统计研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(2):160-168. 被引量:22
  • 3盛昭瀚,高洁,杜建国.基于NW模型的新熊彼特式产业动态演化模型[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(1):1-8. 被引量:27
  • 4王铮 邓峰 等.人口扩散与空间相互作用联系[J].地理研究,1991,10(1):48-55.
  • 5张小蒂 罗挚.巾国能源密集型产品出口贸易的环境代价.中国社会科学文摘,2008,:26-27.
  • 6Schneider, M., Holzer A, and Hoffmann VH. Understanding the CDM's Contribution to Technology Transfer [J]. Energy Policy, 2008(36):2 930 - 2 938.
  • 7Haites,E.,Duan M,and Seres S. Technology Transfer by CDM Projects[J]. Climate Policy, 2006(6) .- 327 - 344.
  • 8Dechezlepretre, A., Glachant M, and Meniere Y. The Clean Deve- lopment Mechanism and the International Diffusion of Technolo- gies:an Empirical Study[J]. Energy Policy,2008 (36): 1 273 - 1 283.
  • 9Seres, S., Haites E, and Murphy K. Analysis of Technology Trans- fer in CDM Projects: an Update[J]. Energy Policy, 2009(37) : 4 919 - 4 926.
  • 10Dechezlepretre,A.,Glachant M,and Meniere Y. Technology Transfer by CDM Projects: a Comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico[J]. Energy Policy, 2009(37) : 703 - 711.

共引文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部