期刊文献+

诺贝尔自然科学奖与科学发现 被引量:3

Nobel Prizes in Natural Science and Scientific Discoveries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以诺贝尔自然科学奖获奖成果的科学发现作为研究对象,可以探讨三个基本而又相互关联的问题:一是诺贝尔自然科学奖获奖成果是发现的还是发明的?这一问题阐释了广义的科学发现思想,科学发现的本质是人类一种复杂的创造性的实践活动,无论是科学事实的发现,还是科学理论的发现,都是包含了发明在内的发现。二是诺贝尔自然科学奖中的科学发现具有怎样的“发现期”?这一问题提出并阐明了“发现期”的概念,运用统计分析方法,揭示了诺贝尔自然科学奖中科学发现的“发现期”的主要性质与特征,在统计学的意义上实证了科学发现的十年磨一剑的“十年法则”。三是诺贝尔自然科学奖中的科学发现是怎样生产的?这里运用案例分析法,通过对获奖人从事获奖研究的具体过程的考析,提出并诠释了科学发现的逻辑超逻辑模式,阐发了科学发现始于问题的提出和终于问题的解答,以及科学发现富含意外的机遇性发现的观点,彰显了获奖人做出重大发现所具有的特质与品格。 Through a study of the prize-winning scientific discoveries of the Nobel Prizes for Natural Science, we can discuss three basic and interrelated questions. First, were prize-winning achievements of the Nobel Prizes for Natural Science discovered or invented? Based on the broad concept of scientific discovery, the answer is that the essence of a scientific discovery is a complex and creative practice by mankind;regardless of the discoveries of scientific facts or the discoveries of scientific theories, discoveries are in essence discoveries including inventions. Second, what is the "discovery period" of the prize-winning scientific discoveries of the Nobel Prizes for Natural Science? The concept of "discovery period" is put forward and clarified in the paper. The main nature and properties of the "discovery period" are revealed based on statistical analysis, which has proved the "Ten-Year Rule" in the statistical sense. Third, how are prize-wining scientific discoveries of the Nobel Prizes for Natural Science made? Through the case analysis of the specific processes that some noble prize winners carried out, this paper puts forward and explains the logic-super logic mode of scientific discovery, elucidates respectively the view that a scientific discovery begins with the raising of questions and ends with the solution of questions and the view that many scientific discoveries are the results of accidental opportunities, and finally manifests some traits and virtues that prize-winners of important discoveries have acquired.
作者 陈其荣 CHEN Qi-rong(School of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
出处 《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期105-122,共18页 Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 诺贝尔自然科学奖 科学发现 “十年法则” 逻辑超逻辑模式 机遇性发现 统计分析 案例分析 Nobel Prize for Natural Science scientific discoveries "Ten-Year Rule" logic-super logic mode discoveries resulting from accidental opportunities statistical analysis case analysis
分类号 C [社会学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1亨利.奥古斯特.罗兰,王丹红.为纯科学呼吁[J].科技导报,2005,23(9):74-79. 被引量:34
  • 2[美]B.巴伯.科学与社会秩序[M].顾昕,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991:101-102.
  • 3[英]W·I·B·贝弗里奇.科学研究的艺术[M].陈捷,译.北京:科学出版社,1979.
  • 4[古希腊]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981,3..
  • 5[英]J·D·贝尔纳 陈体芳译.科学的社会功能[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.220.
  • 6[美]诺曼·列维特.被困的普罗米修斯[M].戴建平译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003.
  • 7[美]V·布什,等.科学-没有止境的前沿[M].北京:商务印书馆.2004.
  • 8[英]约翰·齐曼.真科学:它是什么,它指什么[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002.
  • 9[美]R·K·默顿.科学社会学:上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 10[美]R·K·默顿.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.

共引文献12

同被引文献47

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部