期刊文献+

基于内部转移定价和外部采购的企业战略组织选择 被引量:3

Strategic choice of organizational structure for a firm based on internal transfer pricing and external procurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 越来越多的研究表明,当企业生产最终产品所需的中间产品同时依赖内部生产和外部采购时,采用分权组织结构可以从内部的转移定价获益.本文考虑下游市场存在混合寡头竞争,上游市场存在外部供应商时的企业战略组织决策问题.利用动态博弈的均衡求解方法,在外部供应商垄断供应中间产品的框架下,分析企业在集权和分权两种组织形式的市场均衡.研究结果显示:当供应商垄断供应外部中间产品时,采用分权组织是最优策略. More and more studies indicate that,when a firm relies on both internal production and external procurement of inputs to produce the final products,the firm can glean benefits from decentralization.In this paper we study the strategic organization of a firm when there exists external supplier in input market and engages in mixed competition in the output market.By using the backward induction in a dynamic game,the market equilibriums are analyzed for centralized and decentralized structure under the conditions that the external outputs are provided by a sole supplier.It is proved that decentralization is the preferred strategy when the firm has a sole external input supplier.
作者 王静 殷明娥 WANG Jing;YIN Ming’e(School of Mathematics,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,China)
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2019年第3期307-311,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 辽宁省教育厅科学研究项目(W201783664)
关键词 转移定价 外部采购 混合竞争 集权 分权 transfer pricing external procurement mixed competition centralization decentralization
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1慕银平,唐小我,马永开.不对称竞争条件下的集团转移定价决策[J].控制与决策,2005,20(2):165-169. 被引量:15
  • 2张福利,白宇欣,达庆利.下游市场存在竞争的企业集团转移定价研究[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(6):90-93. 被引量:3
  • 3Alles M, Datar S. Strategic transfer pricing[J]. Management Science, 1998,44(4): 451-46l.
  • 4Gox R F, Schilier U. An economic perspective on transfer pricing[C]. Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007, 2: 673-695.
  • 5Gox R F. Strategic transfer pricing, absorption costing and vertical integration[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2000, 11(3): 327-348.
  • 6Chang W, Ryu H. Optimal transfer pricing: Competition mode, demand and strategic characteristics, and production technology[J]. Global J of Economics, 2013, 2(1): 1-21.
  • 7Sato T. On Coumot-Bertrand mixed duopolies],l], The Japanese Economic Review, 1996,47(4): 412-420.
  • 8Tremblay C, Tremblay V. The Coumot-Bertrand model and the degree of product differentiationl J]. Economic Letters, 2011, 111(3): 233-235.
  • 9Singh N, Vives X. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated oligopoly[J]. RAND J of Economics, 1984, 15(4): 546-554.
  • 10Naimzada A K, Tramontana F. Dynamic properties of a Coumot-Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products[J]. Economic Modelling, 2012, 29(4): 1436- 1439.

共引文献4

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部