期刊文献+

2018年住院医师规范化培训基地自我评估偏差程度的回顾性分析 被引量:1

A retrospective analysis of the self-assessment deviation degrees in standardized residency training bases in 2018
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解培训基地及其专业基地自我评价客观程度。方法选取2018年接受国家综合评估(第三批、第四批、第五批)的培训基地及其专业基地共184个合格对象进行研究,分析各评估对象自我评价分值与国家综合评估分值之间的差距。结果75%的被评估对象都存在自我评价过高的现象,在本轮国家综合评估中被认定不合格的评估对象其自我评估过高现象更为明显,国家级示范基地也存在此种现象。结论国家层面应强化指标解读,提高基地自评认识,帮助基地正确、客观认识自身住培工作水平。 Objective This article aimed to understand the objective degree of self-assessment in standardized residency training bases and their professional bases.Methods A total of 184 training bases and professional bases that received national comprehensive assessment(third batch,fourth batch,fifth batch) in 2018 were selected for research,and the gaps between the self-assessment scores of each assessed object and the national comprehensive assessment scores were analyzed.Results 75% of the assessed bases had higher self-assessment,and the phenomenon of high self-assessment was more obvious for the assessed objects which were not qualified in this round of national comprehensive assessment,and it also existed in national demonstration bases.Conclusion It is necessary to strengthen the interpretation of the assessment indicators in the national level,improve the understanding of the self-assessment,and help the training bases to correctly and objectively understand its own training level.
作者 于渊宁 吴振龙 李鸣莉 姜众 贾明艳 柳琪林 YU Yuanning;WU Zhenlong;LI Mingli;JIANG Zhong;JIA Mingyan;LIU Qilin(Chinese Medical Doctor Association,Beijing 100073,China)
出处 《中国毕业后医学教育》 2019年第3期231-234,共4页 Chinese Journal of Graduate Medical Education
关键词 住院医师规范化培训 自评 偏差 Standardized residency training Self-assessment Deviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献113

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3630
  • 2杜建政,赵国祥,刘金平.测评中的共同方法偏差[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):420-422. 被引量:26
  • 3邢淑芬,俞国良.社会比较:对比效应还是同化效应?[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(6):944-949. 被引量:97
  • 4刘肖岑,桑标,张文新.自利和自谦归因影响大学生人际交往的实验研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(5):1068-1072. 被引量:18
  • 5刘军.(2008).管理研究方法原理与应用.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
  • 6刘肖岑.(2006).大学生自我提升的特点及其与人际交往的关系.硕士学位论文,山东师范大学.
  • 7乔纳森?布朗.(2004).自我(陈浩莺译).北京:人民邮电出版社.
  • 8Alicke,M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than -average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I. Krueger (Eds.),The self in social judgment (pp. 85-106). New York: Psychology Press.
  • 9Ames, D. R., & Kammrath, L. K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 187-209.
  • 10Balcetis, E.,& Dunning, D. (2005). Judging for two: Some connectionist proposals for how the self informs and constrains social judgment. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 181-212). New York: Psychology Press.

共引文献21

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部