摘要
决策活动既是政府管理的首要环节,又是破解政治、经济、社会等问题的前提和基础,也是容易出问题并难以追究责任的活动。公共决策过程中引入专家咨询制度可以防止政府决策随意性、提高公共决策科学性,促进政府与社会公众良性互动。公共决策专家咨询制度具有目标价值、规则体系、实施保障和调整对象四个维度。专家咨询制度文本规则体系方面缺乏独立完整的设计、实施保障方面缺少约束力与问责机制、调整对象方面适用范围与形式不明确,专家参与环节的民主性不足。重构公共决策专家咨询制度的基本理路在于完善立法保障、规范管理程序、明晰适用范围、健全责任机制。
Decision-making activities are not only the primary link of government management, but also the premise and basis for solving political, economical and social problems. They are also activities that are prone to problems and difficult to be held accountable. The introduction of expert consultation system in the process of public decision-making can prevent the arbitrariness of government decision-making, improve the scientific nature of public decision-making, and promote the benign interaction between government and the public. The content of the expert consultation system for public decision-making includes four dimensions:target value, rule system, implementation guarantee and adjustment objects. The defects of expert consultation includes the absence of independent and complete design in rule system, the lack of binding force and accountability mechanism in implementation guarantee, the unclear scope and form of application in adjusting object, and the shortage of democracy in expert participation, etc.. This paper puts forward the basic rationale for reconstructing expert consultation system in public decision-making, such as improving legislative guarantee and standardizing management.
作者
杨建国
李紫衍
Yang Jianguo;Li Ziyan
出处
《中共天津市委党校学报》
北大核心
2019年第5期73-80,共8页
Journal of the Party School of Tianjin Committee of the CPC
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国特色的政府决策问责制度研究”(批准号17BZZ071)
江苏省社会科学基金项目“基层治理的行动逻辑困境及其法治化路径研究”(批准号16ZZB001)
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目“政治动员、乡贤返场与乡村治理重塑研究”(批准号2018SJZDI030)
中央高校人文社科研究项目“资源下乡进程中的分利秩序形成机理及其治理路径研究”(批准号SKCX2019002)
中央高校人文社科优助项目“政府决策责任追究及其体系建构研究”(批准号6JR001)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
公共决策
专家咨询
法治化
科学化
民主化
Public Decision-Making
Expert Consultation
Legal Professionalization
Scientificalization
Democratization