商业数据库与学术期刊评价的问题与对策

Problems and countermeasures of commercial database and academic journal evaluation

【目的】分析商业数据库给学术期刊评价带来的问题,提出科学合理的改进对策。【方法】采用比较研究法、个案分析法,对中国知网、万方、维普等商业数据库的各项指标与学术期刊评价的各项指标进行比较论证。【结果】学术期刊评价中存在被引数据受到了网络首发的影响、web下载量缺少开放获取的数据、学术不端检测系统未对作者起到规范作用、审稿专家库建设不足等问题。【结论】商业数据库需要完善自身的业务与数据体系,为学术期刊评价提供更加全面科学的计量数据;利用开放的学术不端检测系统和审稿人专家库来对学术期刊发表的论文质量进行把关,提升基于商业数据库形成的学术期刊评价体系的科学性、公正性与全面性。

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the problems existing in the evaluation of academic journals by commercial databases,and put forward scientific and reasonable improvement countermeasures.[Methods]Through comparative research and case analysis,the indicators of commercial databases such as CNKI,Wanfang,and Chongqing VIP were compared with the indicators of academic journal evaluation.[Findings]There exist the following problems in the evaluation of academic journals: the cited data is affected by the network first publishing,the web dow nloads lack the open access data,the academic misconduct detection system does not play a role in regulating the authors,and the reviewer database is insufficient.[Conclusions]In order to provide more comprehensive and scientific measurement data,commercial database needs to improve its ow n business and data system for the evaluation of academic journals. In addition,the open academic misconduct detection system and expert reviewer database are used to check the quality of papers published in academic journals,so as to promote the scientific,impartial,and comprehensive evaluation system of academic journals based on commercial database.