期刊文献+

CT、MRI技术诊断急性颅脑损伤的价值对比 被引量:7

Value contrast of CT and MRI in diagnosis of acute craniocerebral injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析CT、磁共振成像(MRI)技术诊断急性颅脑损伤(ACI)的效果。方法分析研究2017年5月~2018年5月我院收治的45例ACI疑似患者,分别进行CT、MRI检查,对比不同诊断技术应用效果及不同检测方式下疾病的影像学特点。结果MRI检测结果显示,确诊急性颅脑损伤30例;MRI检测敏感度、特异度、符合率均高于CT检测,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CT漏诊2例;MRI检测时主要表现为等T1、长T2信号影、稍长T1、T2信号影,CT则出现软组织的等密度影;MRI检测颅骨板骨质断裂时为贯通颅板T2WI高信号影,CT为颅骨板骨质分离、凹陷、不连续。结论ACI采用MRI诊断优势显著优于CT诊断,同时影像学特征显著,可广泛应用于临床。 Objective To compare and analyze the effect of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute craniocerebral injury (ACI). Methods A total of 45 suspected patients with ACI admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected. CT and MRI examinations were performed to compare the effects of different diagnostic techniques and imaging characteristics of different diseases under different detection methods. Results The results of MRI showed that 30 cases were diagnosed as ACI;the sensitivity, specificity and coincidence rate of MRI were higher than those of CT, with significant difference (P<0.05);2 cases were missed by CT diagnosis;iso-T1, long T2 signal, slightly long T1 and T2 signal were the main manifestations of MRI, while iso-density image of soft tissue appeared by CT. When measuring the fracture of skull plate, it was a high signal image of T2WI through the skull plate, and CT showed the separation, depression and discontinuity of the skull plate. Conclusion The advantages of using MRI in the diagnosis of ACI are significantly better than that of CT. Meanwhile, the imaging features are remarkable, which can be widely used in clinic.
作者 钟自华 ZHONG Zi-hua(Department of Imaging, Pingxiang People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Pingxiang 337000, China)
出处 《中国当代医药》 2019年第25期168-170,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 急性颅脑损伤 诊断 CT 磁共振成像 Acute craniocerebral injury Diagnosis CT Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献94

  • 1李鹏飞,白光文,谢俊华.肝内胆管结石伴肝胆管癌患者的临床特征及预后[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(3):298-300. 被引量:12
  • 2林兴旺,潘法中,赵中伟.肝内胆管结石合并胆管癌的影像诊断与临床病理对照[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(3):222-223. 被引量:5
  • 3颜福根,孙长忠.急性颅脑损伤术后继发对侧迟发性血肿诊治分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2007,12(3):178-179. 被引量:10
  • 4范淑俊,薄锋.核磁共振与cT用于急性颅脑损伤诊断价值临床比较[J].中国保健营养(下旬刊),2013,23(12):7734.
  • 5陈家志.急性颅脑损伤应用核磁共振与cT的临床诊断价值对比分析[J].医学信息,2015,28(4):91.
  • 6Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen A J, et al. Pa- tient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain inju- ry: an analysis of 5600 patients [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003,99 (4) :666-673.
  • 7Park JE, Kim SH, Yoon SH, et alJ Risk factors predicting unfavorable neurological outcome during the early period after traumatic brain injury [ J ]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009,45(2) :90 -95.
  • 8Thomas BW, Mejia VA, Maxwell RA, et al. Scheduled re- peat CT scanning for traumatic brain injury remains impor- tant in assessing head injury progression [ J ]. J Am Coil Surg,2010,210(5) :824 - 832.
  • 9Rosenfeld JV, Bell RS, Armonda R. Current concepts in penetrating and blast injury to the central nervous system [ J]. World J Surg,2015,39(6) :1352 - 1362.
  • 10Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S,Nakagawa A, et al. Early CT findings to predict early death in patients with traumatic brain injury: Marshall and Rotterdam CT scoring systems compared in the major academic tertiary care hospital in northeastern Japan [ J ]. Acad Radiol, 2014,21 ( 5 ) : 605 - 611.

共引文献125

同被引文献40

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部