期刊文献+

单纯颈丛阻滞麻醉和颈丛臂丛联合阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折手术患者中的应用对比 被引量:5

Comparison of Simple Cervical Plexus Block Anesthesia Combined Cervical Plexus-brachial Plexus Block Anesthesia in Patients with Clavicular Fracture Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较单纯颈丛阻滞麻醉和颈丛臂丛联合阻滞麻醉对锁骨骨折手术患者的麻醉效果及安全性。方法选取佛山市南海区人民医院2016年1月—2018年6月收治的择期行切开复位内固定术成人锁骨骨折患者70例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各35例。对照组术中行单纯颈丛阻滞麻醉,观察组术中行颈丛臂丛联合阻滞麻醉。比较两组麻醉效果、不良反应及手术过程生命体征、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)变化。结果观察组麻醉优良率高于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率无明显差异(P>0.05);两组患者不同时点心率(HR)及非侵入性血压(NIBP)水平交互比较有差异,切皮时、骨折复位时对照组HR及NIBP水平上升,观察组HR及NIBP水平下降(P<0.05);观察组术后1h、2h、4h疼痛VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05),术后6h两组疼痛评分无差异(P>0.05)。结论颈丛臂丛联合阻滞麻醉相较于单纯颈丛阻滞麻醉对锁骨骨折手术患者麻醉效果较好,基本能完全阻滞锁骨周围组织。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of cervical plexus block anesthesia and cervical plexus brachial plexus block anesthesia in patients undergoing clavicular fracture surgery. Methods 70 adult patients with clavicular fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation from January, 2016 to June, 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 35 cases in each group. The control group received simple cervical plexus block anesthesia,while the observation group underwent cervical plexus brachial plexus block anesthesia. The effects of anesthesia,adverse reactions,vital signs and visual ana logue pain score(VAS)were compared between the two groups. Results The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions be tween the two groups(P>0.05);the heart rate(HR)and non-invasive blood pressure(NIBP)levels of the two groups were signifi cantly different at different time points;the levels of HR and NIBP in the control group increased during skin incision and fracture re duction;and the HR and NIBP levels in the observation group decreased(P<0.05),VAS scores of pain in observation group were lower than those in control group in 1,2 and 4 hours after operation(P<0.05),and there was no difference between two groups in 6 hours after operation(P>0.05). Conclusion The combined cervical plexus and brachial plexus block anesthesia is more effective than the simple cervical plexus block anesthesia in the treatment of clavicular fracture,and can block the periclavicular tissue completely.
作者 邵泳尧 莫平 麦耀海 陈少娟 SHAO Yong-yao;MO Ping;MAI Yao-hai(Department of Anesthesiology,Nanhai District People’s Hospital,Foshan,Guangdong,528200,China)
出处 《黑龙江医学》 2019年第9期1029-1031,共3页 Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词 锁骨骨折 单纯颈丛阻滞麻醉 颈丛臂丛联合阻滞麻醉 骨折内固定术 麻醉效果 安全性 Clavicular fracture Simple cervical plexus block anesthesia Cervical plexus brachial plexus block anesthesia Fracture internal fixation Anesthesia effect Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1王凯,马国臣.改良肌间沟臂丛联合颈丛神经阻滞在肩部及锁骨手术疗效观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(11):408-408. 被引量:4
  • 2谢少锋,王忱,刘怀萍,邱树彬.锁骨手术的三种神经阻滞麻醉效果比较[J].海南医学,2007,18(3):45-46. 被引量:2
  • 3王祥瑞.急性疼痛的机制和治疗进展[J].上海医学,2007,30(6):393-395. 被引量:46
  • 4薛杨,龚志毅.腹腔镜手术后的疼痛治疗[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(4):377-379. 被引量:9
  • 5HERNANDEZ-PALAZON J, TORTOSA J A, NUlqO DE L A ROSA V, et al. Intraperitoneal application of bupivacaine plus morphine for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003, 20(11) : 891-896.
  • 6TOLVER M A, STRANDFELT P, ROSENBERG J, et al. Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [J], SurgEndosc, 2011, 25(12): 3859-3864.
  • 7IKENO S, KAWAMATA M. PainVision[J]. Masui, 2009, 58(11) : 1367-1372.
  • 8KATO J. PainVision[J]. Masui, 2011, 60(9): 1059-1063.
  • 9FUKADA T, IWAKIRI H, OZAKI M. A randomised double-blind crossover trial of the potential analgesic effect of a transdermal nicotine patch in non-smokers based on objective and subjective assessment[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2011, 28(8): 592-596.
  • 10FUJITA F, LAHMANN B', OTSUKA K, et al. Quantification of pain and satisfaction following laperoscopic and open hernia repair[J]. Arch Surg, 2004, 139(6): 596-602.

共引文献146

同被引文献30

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部