期刊文献+

框架-摇摆墙结构的刚度比对框架结构抗震性能的影响 被引量:5

Influence on Seismic Performance of Frame Rocking Wall Structure Stiffness Ratio
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究框架-摇摆墙结构的刚度比对框架结构抗震性能的影响,通过弹塑性有限元软件SNAP建立不同平均层剪切刚度的框架结构,并增设不同刚度比的摇摆墙进行分析比较。结果表明:随着框架-摇摆墙刚度比的增大,结构的层间位移角有不同程度的减小,且层间位移角沿高度方向的分布趋于均匀;原框架结构的平均层剪切刚度越小,框架-摇摆墙刚度比变化的影响越明显;刚度比增大到2.0%时,对结构屈服机制产生影响;框架结构平均层剪切刚度越小,其达到屈服所需的框架-摇摆墙刚度比越大。 In order to study the influence of frame rocking wall structure stiffness ratio on seismic performance,the elastic-plastic finite element software SNAP was used to establish the frame structures with different average shear stiffness,and the analysis and comparison of different stiffness ratio of the rocking walls was included.The results showed that with the increase of the stiffness ratio of frame rocking wall structures,the inter-story drift angle of the structure decreased in different degrees,and the distribution of displacement angle between the layers tended to be uniform along the height direction.The lower the average shear stiffness of the original structure was,the more obvious the change of the influence of the frame rocking wall stiffness ratio would be.When the stiffness ratio increased to 0.2%,it began to influence the structures yield mechanism.The smaller the shear stiffness of the frame structure was,the greater the frame rocking wall rigidity ratio would be required to achieve the yield.
作者 徐培蓁 韩真真 李燊 朱亚光 XU Peizhen;HAN Zhenzhen;LI Shen;ZHU Yaguang(School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)
出处 《结构工程师》 北大核心 2019年第4期105-110,共6页 Structural Engineers
基金 国家自然科学基金(51578342)
关键词 框架-摇摆墙结构 刚度比 有限元分析 层间位移角 屈服机制 frame-rocking wall structure stiffness ratio finite element analysis inter-story drift angle yield mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1毛华,丁洁民.某复杂高层钢结构静力弹塑性分析及性能评价[J].结构工程师,2006,22(1):22-27. 被引量:12
  • 2钱稼茹,邹积麟.静力弹塑性分析在工程中的应用研究[c].第七届高层建筑抗震技术交流会论文集.1999,10.
  • 3ATC.Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings[R],Report No.ATC-40.Applied Technology Council,Redwood City.California:1996.
  • 4FEMA 274.Guidelines and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[S].1998.
  • 5Andrei M Reinhorn,Sashi K Kunnath,Rodolfo Valles-Mattox.IDARC 2D Version4.0:A Computer Program for the Inelastic Damage A nalysis of Buildings.Technical Report NCEER-96-0010,National Center for Ea rthqonke Engineering Research,Buffalo,N.Y.1996:143-175.
  • 6Tso W K.Pushover Analyses:a Tool for Performance-Based Seismic Design[C]//The 5th Conference on T all Buildings.Hongkong:1998:2-9.
  • 7Yang Pu.A Study on Improvement of Pushover Analysis(CD)[C]//12th World Conference On Earthquake Engineering.2000.
  • 8Misael Requena.Evaluation of a Simplified Method for the Determination of the Nonlinear Seismic Response of RC Frames(CD).12th world Conference On Earthquake Engineering.,Paper No.2109,2000:7-11.
  • 9GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 10MIDORIKAWA M,AZUHATA T,ISHIHARA T,et al.Earthquake Response Reduction of Buildings by Rocking Structural Systerns[C]//LIU S C,PINES D J.Smart Structures and Materials 2002:Smart Systems for Bridges,Structures,and Highways.Bellingham:SPIE,2002:265-272.

共引文献105

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部