期刊文献+

美国杜克大学临床型护理博士项目介绍 被引量:2

Doctor of nursing practice program in Duke University in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国杜克大学临床型护理博士项目在全美护理院校中名列前茅,旨在培养多学科合作医疗团队中的护理领导者、促进护理实践变革和为患者提供高质量护理的高级护理专家。以在线学习为主、面授学习为辅的教学形式,为有知识提升需求的临床护理人员的继续教育提供了契机。该项目遴选具有丰富的高级护理实践、科研和教学经验的临床护理专家、护理领导者和研究者作为导师团队指导学生以保证学业质量。该文介绍该项目的开展情况,分析经验与现存问题,以期为我国护理学博士专业学位教育的开展提供借鉴和思考。 Doctor of Nursing Practice(DNP) program in Duke University is among the best in nursing schools in the United States. The program aims to train nurse leaders in interdisciplinary health care teams and advanced practice registered nurses(APRNs) to improve systems of care,patient outcomes,quality,and safety.Online courses supplemented by comprehensive on-campus orientation provide opportunities for those who want to pursue a DNP while earning an advanced nursing practice specialty. Additionally,DNP mentor team is comprised of faculty who are actively engaged in research,scholarship and teaching with broad experience in advanced clinical practice,leadership and patient safety,to guide the DNP students and guarantee the academic quality. The purpose of this article is to introduce this program,analyze the advantages and existing problems in the development of the DNP program,and further to provide valuable insights for the development of DNP program in China.
作者 杨园园 YANG Yuan-yuan
出处 《中华护理教育》 CSCD 2019年第8期577-581,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
关键词 教育 护理 研究生 高级实践护理 护理临床博士 Education, Nursing, Graduate Advanced Practice Nursing Doctor of nursing practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1李八方,周珊珊,曹扬.研究生教育质量保证体系的构成、特征和控制[J].学位与研究生教育,2004(6):20-24. 被引量:28
  • 2潘秋艳,蒋鹤生.美国护理博士教育现状分析[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(2):61-62. 被引量:8
  • 3American Association o{ Colleges of Nursing. Indicators o quality in research - focused doctoral programs in nursing[J]. J Pro[ Nuts, 2002,18(5) :289 - 294.
  • 4International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing, Quality criteria, standards, and indicators (QCSI) for doctoral programs in nursing[EB/OL]. [2012 - 06 - 12]. http://nursing, jhu. edu/aea- demics/ programs/ doctoral/ phd/ inden/ documents/ doctoral - quali- ty_eriteria_inden, pdf.
  • 5Kim MJ, McKenna HP,Ketefian S. Global quality criteria, stand- ards,and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing: Literature review and guideline development [J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006,43 : 477 - 489.
  • 6Higher Education Funding Councils. Improving standards in post- graduate research degree programs; Informal consultation [EB/OL]. [2012 - 06 - 10]. http//www, hefce, ac. uk /pubs/hefce/2003/03/ 01. htm.
  • 7American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice[EB/OL]. [2012 - 07 - 09]. http://www, aacn. nehe. edu/publications/position/DNPE ssentials, pdf.
  • 8Kim MJ ,Park CG, Kim MJ. Quality of nursing doctoral education in Korea: Towards policy development[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing,2011,68(7) :1494 - 1503.
  • 9Satoko N, Misuzu F,Gregg YM. Evaluation of doctoral nursing e& ueation in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty : A comparative study based on a cross - sectional questionnaire survey[J]. Nurse Education Today,2012,32(4):361 -367.
  • 10Ketefian S, Olson J, McKenna HP. Doctoral education in nursing International perspectives[ M]. Abingdon : Routeledge, 2005 : 147 - 148.

共引文献38

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部