盗窃及其在侵犯财产罪中的体系地位

The Theft Crime and Its System Status in Crimes of Property Violation

从结果无价值论立场出发,符合财产犯罪入罪标准的财产侵权行为,原则上均构成侵犯财产罪。于此,在解释论上,必须使各具体财产犯罪构成要件的外延形成周延关系,避免出现不应有的处罚漏洞。盗窃罪是转移占有取得罪的基础罪刑规范,对盗窃行为仅需界定为"解除他人占有、建立新的占有"即可,而不能将其行为方式限制为秘密或者平和、非暴力。盗窃罪是侵占罪的特殊法条;抢夺、抢劫、诈骗等转移占有取得罪系盗窃罪的特殊法条;职务侵占罪的构成要件行为应限于狭义的侵占行为,在行为人利用职务便利窃取本单位财物的场合,由于盗窃罪为职务侵占罪的特殊法条,故应以盗窃罪论处。

From the standpoint of the valuelessness of the results,property infringement that meets the criteria for criminalization of property crimes should,in principle,constitute a crime of property infringement.Therefore,in terms of interpretation,it is necessary to make the extension of the constitutive elements of each specific property crime form a peripheral relationship,so as to avoid undue loopholes in punishment.Theft crime is the basic criminal norms of transfer possession crime,the only way to define theft is to“remove the possession of others and establish a new possession”,and not to restrict its behavior to secret or peaceful or non-violent.Theft crime is a special law of embezzlement,the crime of transferring possession by the crime of forcible seizure,robbery,fraud,are special law on theft crime.The constitutive elements of the crime of duty embezzlement should be limited to the narrowly-defined act of embezzlement.On the occasion of the perpetrator taking advantage of his position to steal the property of the unit,the crime of theft becomes a special law of the crime of duty embezzlement,which should be punished as the crime of theft.