间接正犯消解说之审视与批判:基于单一制的立场

The Examine and Criticizeabout the Negation of Indirect Principal Offender Based on Principal and Accomplice Dividing System:On the Perspective of Unitaryprincipal Offender System

区分制主张共犯对正犯具有要素从属性,但由于在从属程度上存在不同意见,其内部近来出现了试图用教唆犯、帮助犯、共同正犯等概念来取代间接正犯的"消解说"。从结论上看,这一主张与单一制的观点不谋而合,但由于"消解说"固守共犯对正犯具有从属性的立场,而且对构成要件该当行为内涵的理解上存在误差,致使其在理论根基和具体的解决路径上都存在瑕疵。

The Differentiating System claims that the accomplice accessory to the principal offender,but because there are different opinions in the subordinate degree,its internal recently appeared a proposition that using the solicitation stipulated to replace the indirect principal offender.Looking from the conclusion,this proposition and unitary theory happen to coincide.Because it holds on the standpoint that the accomplice is an accessory to the principal offender and misunderstands the meaning the constitutive element behavior,it causees this proposition in both the theory foundation and concrete solving path was flawed.Therefore,we should rely on the unitary crime participation system to solve the theoretical and judicial problems existing in the problem of criminal participation in our country.