"医学沙龙式"教学在妇产科住院医师规范化培训中的应用

Application of "medical Salon" teaching in standardized training of residents in gynecology and obstetrics department

目的探讨"医学沙龙式"教学在妇产科住院医师规范化培训中的应用。方法选取2015年8月至2018年3月在武汉大学人民医院接受住院医师规范化培训的妇产科住院医师30人,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组15人。除日常培训之外,实验组每周举办一次"理论沙龙",每季度举办一次"手术沙龙"。两组医师均接受基础理论、临床实践水平测评及培训满意度评价;采用SPSS 17.0对组内、组间数据行t检验或配对t检验。结果规范化培训开始前,两组学员基础理论、临床实践考核评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。培训结束后,两组医师的基础理论及临床实践考核评分较培训前均有提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训结束后,实验组学员基础理论考核评分高于对照组[(95.20±3.67)vs.(82.10±5.62)]、临床实践考核评分高于对照组[(96.80±3.26)vs.(79.50±5.28)],且教学满意度评分也高于对照组[(95.50±3.54)vs.(86.70±4.95)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论"医学沙龙式"教学有助于提高妇产科住院医师规范化培训质量,值得推广。

Objective To investigate the application of "medical Salon" teaching in standardized training of residents in gynecology and obstetrics department. Methods A total of 30 residents of obstetrics and gynaecology receiving standardized training in the People's Hospital of Wuhan University from August 2015 to March 2018 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 15 persons in each group. In addition to daily training, the experimental group held a "theoretical salon" once a week and a "surgical salon" every quarter. Both groups of physicians took examinations of basic theories and clinical practice level and received evaluation of training satisfaction;SPSS 17.0 was used to perform t-test or paired t-test on intra-and inter-group data. Results Before the standardization training began, there was no significant difference in the scores of the basic theory and clinical practice between the two groups (P>0.05). After the training, the basic theory and clinical practice scores of the two groups were improved compared with those before training, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After the training, the scores of the basic theoretical examination of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group [(95.20±3.67) vs.(82.10±5.62)], and the scores of clinical practice of the experimental group was higher than the control group [(96.80±3.26) vs.(79.50±5.28)];the teaching satisfaction scores of the experimental group were higher as well [(95.50±3.54) vs.(86.70±4.95)]. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The "Medical Salon" teaching helps to improve the quality of standardized training for obstetrics and gynecology residents and is worth promoting.