期刊文献+

失重的“压舱石”?经贸合作的“赫希曼效应”分析——以德俄关系与中德关系为比较案例 被引量:19

Weightless“Ballast”?The “Hirschmanesque Effect”in Economic and Trade Cooperation——Taking German-Russian Relations and China-German Relations as Comparative Cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 国家间的经贸联系与双边政治外交关系之间如何相互影响,一直是国际关系研究的重大理论问题。本文探讨了经贸联系产生"赫希曼效应"的因果机制。当贸易结构无法在贸易伙伴国国内形成愿意付出政治资本以代言本国利益的利益集团时,经贸合作将难以起到维持政治外交关系的"压舱石"作用,反之则相反。中国和俄罗斯同为德国的重要经贸合作伙伴,并且在政治制度和价值观等方面的差异都曾给双边政治关系造成冲击,但"赫希曼效应"促进了德俄关系的稳定,而在中德关系中却没有发挥明显的作用。经贸关系成为德俄双边政治关系中的"压舱石",而在中德之间却缺少一种防止双边关系出现剧烈震荡的机制或力量。 How the economic and trade relations between countries and bilateral political and diplomatic relations affect each other is always a topic of interest in international relations.This paper explores the causal mechanism of the"Hirschmanesque Effect"of economic and trade links,and argues that when the trade structure fails to produce interest groups in the trading partner countries,economic and trade cooperation can hardly serve as a"ballast"in bilateral political and diplomatic relations.China and Russia are important economic and trade partners of Germany,and their differences in political system and values have impacted bilateral political relations.However,the "Hirschmanesque Effect"has promoted the stability of German-Russian relations,while it has not played a significant role in China-German relations.Economic and trade relations have become the"ballast"in the bilateral political relations between Germany and Russia.But there is no mechanism to prevent sudden shocks in bilateral relations between China and Germany.
作者 熊炜 XIONG Wei
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期81-103,I0003-I0004,共25页 Foreign Affairs Review
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“地缘政治风险预测的理论与方法研究”(项目编号:17zda110)的阶段性成果
关键词 经贸合作 双边关系 赫希曼效应 德俄关系 中德关系 利益集团 economic and trade cooperation bilateral relations Hirschmanesque Effect German-Russian relations China-German relations interest groups
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献129

  • 1刘立群,孙彦红.德国教授谈欧盟共同外交与安全政策[J].欧洲研究,2004,22(6):150-152. 被引量:3
  • 2梅兆荣.德国默克尔政府的外交政策调整[J].当代世界,2007(8):20-22. 被引量:10
  • 3Paul A. Samuelson, "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure," The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1954, p.387.
  • 4Mancur Olson, Logic of Collective Action.Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge. Harvard U- niversity Press, 1965, p. 14.
  • 5John G. Ruggie, "Collective Goods and Future International Collaboration," American Political Science Re- view, Vol. 66, No. 3, 1972, pp. 887-888.
  • 6Oliver Morrissey, Dirk Willem te Velde, and Adrian Hewitt, "Defining International Public Goods. Con- ceptual Issues," in Inge Kaul, Pedro Conceicao, KateU Le Goulven, and Ronald U. Mendoza, eds. , Prov/ding Global Public Goods. Managing Globalization, New York. Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 32-33.
  • 7Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg and Marc A. Stem, "Defining Global Public Goods," in Inge Kaul, Isa- belle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern, eds. , Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century, New York. Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 4-5.
  • 8Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grnnberg, and Marc A. Stern, ed., Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century, New York. Oxford University Press, 1999, p. xxi.
  • 9Inge Kaul and Ronald U. Mendoza, "Ad- vancing the Concept of Public Goods," in Inge Kaul, Pedro Coneeicao, Katell Le Goulven, and Ronald U. Men- doza, eds. , Providing Global Public Goods . Managing Globalization, New York . Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 95.
  • 10Vivian Leia. Steven Tuckerb. and FiliD Veselv. "Foreia'n Aid and Weakest-Link International PublicGoods . An Experimental Study," European Economic Review, Vol. 51, No. 3,2006, pp. 599-623.

同被引文献237

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部