期刊文献+

“有限理性”的消费者与广告有效诉求的实现——基于行为经济学视角 被引量:10

Consumers with Bounded Rationality and the Realization of Advertising Appeals: A Perspective of Behavioral Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行为经济学对人性中情感性和非理性因素的分析和肯定,为实现广告的有效诉求提供了有益启示。行为经济学关于人具有"有限理性"的基本判断,促进了广告研究者对广告信息加工过程的理解;框架效应的存在,提示广告诉求要注意信息展示的技巧;心理账户理论展示了金钱的"非替代性",提示广告诉求应顺应或引导消费者的心理账户设置;禀赋效应的普遍存在,提示广告在诉求弃旧换新时要关注消费者的心理成本;稀缺效应揭示了稀缺性对消费心态和消费行为的影响,提醒广告人要区别对待富裕消费者和贫穷消费者;助推强调以低成本方式引导和优化决策,对其的借鉴有助于提升公益广告的说服效果。 The analysis and affirmation of emotional and irrational factors in human beings in behavioral economics have provided the realization of advertising appeals with some positive enlightenments: the basic belief that humans are of bounded rationality has promoted researchers’ understanding on the effectiveness of advertisement;the existence of framing effect implies the importance of information exhibition skills;the mental accounting theory shows that money is irreplaceable, which suggests advertising appeals should comply with or guide consumers’ mental account;the endowment effect reminds advertisers of concerns on consumers’ psychological costs when appealing to change;the scarcity effect reveals the influence of scarcity on consumers’ attitude and behavior, suggesting that advertising should be made differently based on the audiences’ incomes;the nudging theory empathizes guiding and optimizing decision with low cost, which is helpful for improving the effects of public service advertising.
作者 刘振 LIU Zhen(College of Journalism and Communication,Hunan Normal University,Changsha, Hunan 410006,China)
出处 《财经理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期136-141,共6页 The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJC860030)
关键词 有限理性 广告诉求 框架效应 心理账户 禀赋效应 助推 Bounded rationality Advertising appeal Framing effect Mental accounting Endowment effect Nudging
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献160

  • 1YANG XiaoYan,YU JinCheng,Lü HouYuan,CUI TianXing,GUO JingNing,GE QuanSheng.Starch grain analysis reveals function of grinding stone tools at Shangzhai site, Beijing[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2009,52(8):1164-1171. 被引量:34
  • 2李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 3谢桂阳,程刚.高校贫困生的个性特征及心理健康状况[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):632-632. 被引量:125
  • 4李爱梅,凌文辁,方俐洛,肖胜.中国人心理账户的内隐结构[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):706-714. 被引量:90
  • 5Simonson, I., & Drolet, A. (2004). Anchoring effects on consumers' willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 681-690.
  • 6Tansuhaj, E, Gentry, J. W., & John, J. (1991). A cross-national examination of innovation resistance. International Mar- keting Review, 8, 7-29.
  • 7Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 36-90.
  • 8Zhang, Y., & Fishback, A. (2005). The role of anticipated emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 316-324.
  • 9Aggarwal, P., & Zhang, M. (2006). The moderating effect of relationship norm salience on consumers' loss aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 413-419.
  • 10Cartoon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 2 7, 360-370.

共引文献263

同被引文献113

引证文献10

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部