期刊文献+

腹腔镜下非网片植入术治疗盆底功能障碍临床研究 被引量:2

Clinical study of laparoscopic non mesh implantation for pelvic floor dysfunction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下非网片植入术治疗盆底功能障碍患者的临床效果.方法对52例盆底功能障碍患者行腹腔镜下非网片植入术治疗,观察6个月.记录手术完成时间、术中出血量、尿管留置时间,随时记录盆腔感染、神经损伤等发生情况,比较手术前后盆底功能评估参数的变化;于手术前后采用盆底功能障碍问卷、盆底障碍影响简易问卷7评定患者的生活质量.结果本组患者均顺利完成手术,术后均无盆腔感染、神经损伤等发生,均未发现复发;术后6个月盆底功能评估参数各项指标均较手术前明显改善(P<0.01),术后6个月盆底功能障碍问卷、盆底障碍影响简易问卷7评分均较手术前显著下降(P<0.01).结论腹腔镜下非网片植入术治疗盆底功能障碍患者效果显著,安全性高,能显著提高患者术后生活质量,值得在临床推广应用. Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic non mesh reconstruction for pelvic floor dysfunction. Methods 52 patients with pelvic floor dysfunction were selected and treated by laparoscopic non-mesh implantation, and observed for 6 months. Record the time of surgery completion, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the time of urethral indwelling, and record the occurrence of pelvic infection and nerve injury at any time. Compare the changes in parameters of pelvic floor function evaluation before and after surgery. The quality of life of patients was assessed by PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 before and after surgery. Results All the patients underwent surgery successfully. No postoperative pelvic infection or nerve injury occurred. No recurrence was found. At 6 months after operation, the parameters of pelvic floor function e-valuation parameters were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P<0. 01). The PFDI-20 and PFDI-20 scores were significantly lower than those before surgery (P<0. 01). Conclusions Laparoscopic non-mesh implantation of pelvic floor dysfunction repair has a better effect, can significantly improve the quality of life of patients, it is worthy of clinical application.
作者 赵维楠 陈淑霞 刘松鸽 韩会娟 谢文娟 董瑞娜 史英 Zhao Weinan;Chen Shuxia;Liu Songge;Han Huijuan;Xie Wenjuan;Dong Ruina;Shi Ying(Xuchang Central Hospital, Xuchang 461000 , Henan, China)
机构地区 许昌市中心医院
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2019年第5期80-82,97,共4页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
基金 许昌市科技计划项目(编号20170213265).
关键词 盆底功能障碍 腹腔镜 非网片植入术 临床效果 生活质量 Pelvic floor dysfunction laparoscopy non-mesh implantation clinical effect quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献97

  • 1邬善敏,方伟,赫杰,谭海燕.可吸收生物缝合线在普外科中的应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1570-1571. 被引量:10
  • 2Bump R C, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1): 10-17.
  • 3Granese R, Candiani M, Perino A, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2009, 146(2): 227-231.
  • 4Maher C F, Feiner B, DeCuyper E M, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 204(4): 360.e1-360.e7.
  • 5Khan A, Alperin M, Wu N, et al. Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among Medicare beneficiaries[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(11): 1883-1891.
  • 6Freeman R M, Pantazis K, Thomson A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(3): 377-384.
  • 7North C E, Ali-Ross N S, Smith A R, et al. A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. BJOG, 2009, 116(9): 1251-1257.
  • 8Candiani M, Izzo S, Bulfoni A, et al. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200(4): 368.e1-368.e7.
  • 9Nygaard I E, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 104(4): 805- 823.
  • 10Woodruff A J, Roth C C, Winters J C. Abdominal sacral colpopexy: surgical pearls and outcomes[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2007, 8(5): 399-404.

共引文献170

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部