期刊文献+

复杂气井井筒完整性量化分级评价方法 被引量:1

Quantitative grading evaluation method for complex gas wellbore integrity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于统计学理论提出了一种复杂气井井筒完整性的量化评价方法,并进行了工程应用。在力学分析和失效评价的基础上,引入了统计学理论和可靠度计算方法对复杂气井井筒完整性进行全面的评价。基于中心点法推导了量化井筒完整性的可靠概率计算公式,并用Monte-Carlo法验证了其精度。通过建立“井筒完整性可靠概率”与“井筒完整性可靠性指标”之间的关系,给出了复杂气井井筒完整性的分级评价标准。研究表明:中心点法和Monte-Carlo法得到的T4井筒完整性可靠概率分别为0.8966和0.9106,井筒完整性的评价结果分别为“较可靠”和“很可靠”,证明了中心点方法精度良好。研究成果可为复杂气井井筒的设计、安全风险评价提供理论和方法支持。 Formulas of reliability of wellbore integrity are derived through central-point method and comparatively verified by the Monte-Carlo method.Built upon these formulas,relationship between“wellbore integrity reliability probability(WIRP)”and“wellbore integrity reliability index(WIRI)”is established and expatiated.On this basis,the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method is verified by case of T4.The results show that the WIRP of T4 is 0.8966 and the integrity grade is“minor reliable”using the proposed method in this dissertation,while the WIRP of T4 is 0.9106 and the integrity grade is“reliable”using Monte-Carlo method.It is proved that the evaluation method proposed herein is accurate and relatively conservative which is more suitable for practical application.The achievements of this dissertation are expected to provide the guidance for the design and safety evaluation of gas wells.
作者 刘铭刚 王廷春 李勇 逄铭玉 万古军 LIU Minggang;WANG Tingchun;LI Yong;PANG Mingyu;WAN Gujun(Sinopec Research Institute of Safety Engineering,Qingdao 266100,China;State Key Laboratory of Safety and Control for Chemicals, Sinopec Research Institute of Safety Engineering,Qingdao 266100,China)
出处 《中国矿业》 北大核心 2019年第10期168-174,共7页 China Mining Magazine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目资助(编号:51804330)
关键词 复杂气井 井筒风险 井筒完整性 中心点法 MONTE-CARLO法 complex oil and gas wells wellbore risk wellboreintegrity central-point method Monte-Carlo method
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1王建东,史交齐,林凯,杨鹏.套管抗挤强度的可靠性评价方法[J].石油工业技术监督,2005,21(11):36-38. 被引量:5
  • 2闫相祯,高进伟,杨秀娟.油气井套管柱的抗震可靠性分析[J].石油钻采工艺,2006,28(5):4-6. 被引量:2
  • 3高进伟,闫相祯,杨秀娟,王建军.用可靠性理论分析传统套管设计中存在的问题[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):78-83. 被引量:11
  • 4闫相祯,高进伟,杨秀娟.用可靠性理论解析API套管强度的计算公式[J].石油学报,2007,28(1):122-126. 被引量:22
  • 5American Petroleum Institute. API Bulletin 5C3-1994. Bulletin on formulas and calculations for casing,tubing,drill pipe and line pipe properties [S]. Dallas : API Production Department, 1994.
  • 6国家石油和化学工业局.SY/T5322-2000套管柱强度设计方法[S].北京:机械工业出版社,2001.
  • 7Miller R A. Real world implementation of QRA methods in casing design[R]. SPE 48325,1998.
  • 8Lewis D B. Load and resistance factor design for oil country tubular goods-R-. OTC 7936,1995.
  • 9Cunha J C, Demirdal B, Gui P. Use of quantitative risk analysis for uncertainty quantification on drilling operations review and lessons learned [R]. SPE 94980,2005.
  • 10International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 10400-2007 Petroleum and natural gas industries-equations and calculations for the properties of casing,tubing,drill pipe and line pipe used as casing or tu bing[S]. Geneva : ISO Copyright Office, 2007.

共引文献31

同被引文献3

引证文献1

;
使用帮助 返回顶部