期刊文献+

基于齐当别理论的公交出行决策选择反转 被引量:1

Bus Travel Choice Reversals Based on the Equate-to-Differentiate Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择反转是交通行为中的一种悖论现象,未能通过实验的谨慎误差控制得到良好解释.本研究从决策心理学的角度,基于齐当别理论建立起选择支属性的判断维度体系,在确定、不确定以及风险条件下进行了3种公交出行决策场景的心理实验.实验结果中匹配任务的效应分析说明,齐当别理论的侦测性占优原则可对出行方式选择进行解释;选择一致性的重测信度分析说明,出行者对交通方式属性维度的判断是可变过程;选择和匹配一致性分析说明,选择变异随匹配任务中的维度判断的改变而产生.总体上,3组实验选择反转的变化特征趋势符合实验设计框架,齐当别模型的解释在3组实验中均表现出显著一致性,能够对出行方式的选择反转进行预测和解释,即当出行者采取不同的齐同策略时,重复选择中令人费解的反转悖论现象便会出现. Choice reversal is a paradox phenomenon in traffic behavior,and it can not be well explained through error cautious control.From the perspective of decision psychology,the judgment dimension system of option attributes,and carries out three groups of psychological experiments in different bus travel decision situation was established based on the equate-to-differentiate theory.Through the matching task,it was confirmed that choice can be explained under the equate-to-differentiate interpretation.Through the retest reliability analysis for choice consistency,it was proved that the judgment for dimension is variable.Through the retest reliability analysis for choice and matching consistency,it was proved that choice reversals are caused by the change of the dimension judgment in matching task.The equate-to-differentiate interpretation shows good consistency in the three groups of experiments.The judgment dimension system can predict and explain the travel choice reversal.That is,the inexplicable paradox occurs when diverse equate-to-differentiate strategy is used.
作者 张年 罗霞 张可 ZHANG Nian;LUO Xia;ZHANG Ke(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,Sichuan,China;National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation,Chengdu 610031,Sichuan,China;Beijing Transportation Operations Coordination Center,Beijing 100000,China)
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第9期61-67,共7页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 交通运输部信息化技术研究项目(2014364X14040) 四川省科技计划项目(2017JY0072)~~
关键词 交通运输工程 选择反转 齐当别理论 心理实验 匹配效应 重测信度 一致性分析 transportation engineering choice reversals equate-to-differentiate theory psychological experiment matching effect test-retest reliability consistency analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献74

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2毕研玲,李纾.有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为——当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):682-688. 被引量:16
  • 3Houston, D. A., S. J. Sherman. Cancellation and focus: The role of shared and unique features in the choice process[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31:357-378
  • 4Houston, D. A, S. J. Sherman, and S. M. Baker. Feature matching, unique features, and the dynamics of the choice process: Predecision conflict and postdecision satisfaction[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, 27:411-430
  • 5Li, S., R. Zheng, and L-B, Li. Do shared features of offered alternatives have an effect in consumer choice? [J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2007, 28(6): 658-677
  • 6Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. Odonoghue. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 351-401
  • 7McClure, S. M., D. I. Laibson, G. Loewenstein, and J. D. Cohen. Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards[J]. Science, 2004, 306(5695): 503-507
  • 8Loewenstein, G., R. H. Thaler. Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, 3(4): 181-193
  • 9Tversky, A., S. Sattath, and P. Slovic. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice[J]. Psychological Review, 1988, 95(3): 371- 384
  • 10Sloman S. A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119:3-22

共引文献43

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部