药学领域研究热点分析——以《中国药房》为例

Analysis of Hot Spots in the Field of Pharmacy——Taking China Pharmacy as Example

目的:探讨目前药物研究与应用领域的热点,为药学期刊编辑遴选稿件提供参考。方法:以《中国药房》(以下简称"我刊")为例,检索中国知网收录的我刊自创刊(1990年1月)至2019年3月19日收录的所有文献,筛选以下载量和被引量为指标计算的综合评分在中国知网排名前150名的文献(根据实际情况纳入100篇非综述文献和50篇综述文献),对其发表年份、非综述类文献的栏目分布、第一作者单位、主题词进行分析,同时对1篇被引量较高的文献进行单独分析。结果:纳入的150篇文献发表于1993-2016年,发表于2010年的文献数量达到最高,为18篇;在非综述类文献中,"药事管理"(44篇,44.00%)、"中药与民族药"(18篇,18.00%)、"药师与药学服务"(14篇,14.00%)栏目的文章最多;150位文献的第一作者主要来自大专院校73位(48.67%)、医院62位(41.33%);非综述类文献的主题词为"现状与发展"(20次)、"活性成分"(14次)、"国际经验"(9次),综述类文献为"药理作用"(25次)、"中药材"(15次)、"活性成分"(12次)。《医院药品DDD数排序分析的原理及利用》一文被引量达到1 426次,远高于第二名的261次。结论:本研究明确了药学研究优秀稿件的来源和研究方向,为读者提示了业界研究热点,同时,高频被引文献也提示研究者可对业界尚存在争论、不清晰的内容进行深入分析。

OBJECTIVE:To explore current hot spots in drug research and application,and provide reference of the draft use standard for pharmacy journal editor. METHODS:Taking China Pharmacy(short for our magazine) as example,all literatures published by our magazine and included by CNKI were searched during inception(Jan. 1990) and Mar. 19 th,2019;top 150 literatures [top 100 non-review literatures(NRA)and top 50 review literatures(RA)] were collected according to comprehensive score of downloaded number and citied number as indicators,and then analyzed in respects of publication year,column of NRA,first author’s work unit,subject words;one literatures which the cited number was largest was analyzed separately. RESULTS:Totally 150 literatures were published between 1993 and 2016,while the literature amount reached the maximum value in 2010(18 articles). Among NRA,the most were in the columns of"pharmacy administration"(44 articles,44.00%),"TCM and ethnic medicine"(18 articles,18.00%),"pharmacists and pharmaceutical care"(14 articles,14.00%). Among 150 first authors,73(48.67%) were from college,62(41.33%) were from hospital. Subject words of NRA were"status and development"(20 times),"active ingredient"(14 times),"international experience"(9 times),while those of RA were"pharmacological action"(25 times),"Chinese herbal medicine"(15 times),"active ingredient"(12 times). The Principles and Utilization of Sequential Analysis of DDD System of Drug in Hospitals was cited for 1 426 times,which was much higher than the second one(261 times).CONCLUSIONS: This study can show the good literatures origin and study direction,provide reference to the hot spots for readers. At the same time,high-frequency cited literatures also suggests that researchers can conduct in-depth analysis of controversial and unclear contents in academic circles.