期刊文献+

根本原因分析法对脑外伤术后患者压疮发生风险的影响 被引量:1

Effect of Root Cause Analysis on the Risk of Pressure Ulcer in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨根本原因分析法(root cause analysis,RCA)在脑外伤术后压疮预防护理中的应用效果。方法 2016年2月-2019年2月对该院脑外科术后压疮预防护理措施实施RCA,查找问题及隐患,分析原因,提出解决措施,修改护理流程及措施,对护理人员培训,RCA后按改进护理措施进行护理,采用Braden量表及Shea分级量表评价RCA实施前(对照组)及实施RCA后(研究组)压疮发生风险变化。结果研究组及对照组术前Braden评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术后第3天及第7天两组患者Braden评分均较术前降低(P<0.05),研究组术后第3天及第7天Braden评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后压疮NPUAP分期低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论根本原因分析法能够降低脑外伤术后患者压疮发生风险,提高皮肤护理质量,改善护理效果。 Objective To explore the application effect of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) in the prevention and treatment of pressure sore after traumatic brain injury. Methods From February 2016 to February 2019, we implemented RCA on preventive nursing measures for pressure ulcers after brain surgery in the hospital, to find problems and hidden dangers, analyze the causes, propose solutions, modify the nursing procedures and measures, and train the nursing staff after RCA. According to the improved nursing measures, the Braden scale and Shea grading scale were used to evaluate the risk changes of pressure ulcers before RCA(control group) and after RCA (study group). Results There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative Braden score between the study group and the control group (P>0.05). The Braden scores of the two groups were lower than those before the operation on the 3rd and 7th day after surgery (P<0.05). The Braden scores on the 3rd and 7th day were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The NPUAP stage of postoperative pressure ulcer in the study group was lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Root cause analysis can reduce the risk of pressure ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury, improve the quality of skin care and improve the nursing effect.
作者 叶丽倩 YE Li-qian(Department of Neurosurgery,the Second People's Hospital of Taixing,Taixing City,Jiangsu Province,225411 China)
出处 《中国卫生产业》 2019年第25期3-5,共3页 China Health Industry
关键词 脑外伤 根本原因分析法 压疮 BRADEN量表 Shea量表 Brain trauma Root cause analysis Pressure sores Braden scale Shea scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1刘庆荣.褥疮的预防和治疗新进展[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(11):445-445. 被引量:1
  • 2张淑静.水囊和油菜籽垫在腹水超滤病人褥疮预防中的应用[J].青海医药杂志,2007,37(5):43-44. 被引量:2
  • 3薛小玲,刘慧,景秀琛,孙志敏,童淑萍,邝惠容,彭美慈,汪国成,何淑贞.3种评估表预测压疮效果的比较研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(4):241-243. 被引量:139
  • 4谢小燕,刘雪琴.两种压疮危险因素评估量表在手术患者中信度和效度比较研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(4):359-361. 被引量:98
  • 5张美琪,张秀玲,吴宜佩,等.运用根本原因分析提升用药安全案例分享[J].药学杂志,2010,26(2):74-80.
  • 6吴宛庭,康春梅,陈有如,等.运用根本原因分析手法改善用药安全性—个案研究[J].医疗品质杂志,2009,4(01):33-42.
  • 7Moore ZE, Cowman S. Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers[ J]. The Cochrane Library, 2013, 3: CD004983. DOI: 10. 1002/ 14651858. CD004983. pub2.
  • 8Coleman S, Nelson EA, Keen J, et al. Developing a pressure ulcer risk factor minimum data set and risk assessment framework [J]. JAdv Nars, 2014, 70(10): 2339-2352. DOI:10.1111/jan. 12444.
  • 9Black J. Pressure ulcer prevention and management: a dire need for good science[ J]. Ann Intern Med, 2015, 162(5) : 387-388. DOI : 0. 7326/M15-0190.
  • 10Moore Z, Cowman S. Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices in care of the older person in the Republic of Ireland [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2012, 21(3/4) : 362-371. DOI:10. 1111/j. 1365-2702. 2011. 03749. x.

共引文献31

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部