期刊文献+

工作坊宣教模式对感染性胰腺坏死清创引流术后患者出院指导质量的影响 被引量:4

Effect of workshop teaching mode on quality of discharge guidance in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis after necrosectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价工作坊宣教模式对感染性胰腺坏死清创引流术后患者出院指导质量的影响.方法采用方便抽样方法,选取2018年5-12月北京市某三级甲等综合医院的82例感染性胰腺坏死清创引流术后患者,分为对照组(40例)与干预组(42例).对照组采用常规出院宣教方式,干预组采用工作坊宣教模式进行宣教.使用一般资料调查问卷及出院指导质量量表收集资料并测评,比较并分析两组患者的出院指导质量得分差异.结果干预组的出院指导质量总分为(157.80±13.05)分,高于对照组的(148.05±17.85)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预组的获得内容、讲授技巧和效果评价得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步分析显示,其主要差异集中于清创引流术后患者自我照顾信息的获得、照顾者信息的获得、护士检查及示范、信息的一致性等方面,干预组均有所提高(P<0.05).结论工作坊宣教模式应用于感染性胰腺坏死清创引流术后患者,能有效提高患者的出院指导质量. Objective To evaluate the effect of workshop teaching mode on quality of discharge guidance in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis after necrosectomy. Methods Totally 82 patients with infective pancreatic necrosis after necrosectomy in a tertiary general hospital in Beijing were selected by convenient sampling method from May to December 2018. The patients were divided into control group (40 cases) and intervention group(42 cases). The control group received the routine discharge guidance, while the intervention group received the workshop teaching mode discharge guidance. General Information Questionnaire and the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale(QDTS) were adopted to evaluate quality of discharge guidance and compare the difference between two groups. Results There was a statistically significant difference between the control group and the intervention group in the total score of QDTS (P<0.05), while the score of intervention group(157.80±13.05) was significantly higher than the control group (148.05±17.85). The scores of received content, teaching skill and effect evaluation in the intervention group were higher than the control group (P< 0.05). Further analysis showed that the main differences were concentrated in patients' acquisition of self-care information, caregivers' acquisition of nursing information, consistency of information, and nurses' examination and demonstration. In these sections,The scores of intervention group were higher (P< 0.05). Conclusions The workshop teaching mode applied to patients with infected pancreatic necrosis after necrosectomy can effectively improve the quality of discharge guidance.
作者 孔令玲 杨洋 张宇 王欣然 Kong Lingling;Yang Yang;Zhang Yu;Wang Xinran(Department of General Surgery t Xuan Wu Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2019年第21期2739-2743,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 首都护理学研究专项课题(17HL12).
关键词 感染性胰腺坏死 工作坊 宣教 出院指导 管道护理 Infected pancreatic necrosis Workshop Nursing education Discharge guidance Nursing of patients with tube
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献86

  • 1伍晓汀,周勇.腹腔引流管的正确选择和合理应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(1):35-36. 被引量:94
  • 2罗建河.反思性教育管理培训:第四种教育管理培训理念[J].教学与管理(理论版),2007(5):6-8. 被引量:3
  • 3Petrov MS,Shanbhag S,Chakraborty M,et al.Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis[J].Gastroenterology,2010,139(3):813-820.
  • 4Widdison AL,Karanjia ND.Pancreatic infection complicating acute pancreatitis[J].Br J Surg,1993,80(2):148-154.
  • 5Freeny PC,Hauptmann E,Althaus SJ,et al.Percutaneous CT guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis:techniques and results[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,1998,170(4):969-975.
  • 6van Baal MC,van Santvoort HC,Bollen TL,et al.Systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage as primary treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis[J].Br J Surg,2011,98(1):18-27.
  • 7Mouli VP,Sreenivas V,Garg PK.Efficacy of conservative treatment,without necrosectomy,for infected pancreatic necrosis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Gastroenterology,2013,144(2):333-340.e2.
  • 8Gardner TB,Chahal P,Papachristou GI,et al.A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2009,69(6):1085-1094.
  • 9Bakker OJ,van Santvoort HC,van Brunschot S,et al.Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis:a randomized trial[J].JAMA,2012,307(10):1053-1061.
  • 10Seifert H,Biermer M,Schmitt W,et al.Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis:a multicentre study with long-term follow-up(the GEPARD Study)[J].Gut,2009,58(9):1260-1266.

共引文献385

同被引文献44

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部