期刊文献+

内镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃及大肠息肉的临床治疗效果研究 被引量:5

Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Gastric and Colorectal Polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨对胃及大肠息肉患者采取内镜下黏膜切除术治疗的临床效果。方法:选择某院于2017年1月~2018年1月所收治的132例胃及大肠息肉患者进行对比研究,各组患者分别为66例。常规组采取常规手术治疗,实验组采取内镜下黏膜切除术治疗,观察并对比常规组和实验组的治疗效果以及不良反应的发生几率。结果:实验组的治疗有效率63例(95.45%)明显优于常规组46例(69.70%),实验组不良反应的发生几率2例(3.03%)明显低于常规组16例(24.24%)。结论:对胃及大肠息肉患者采取内镜下黏膜切除术进行治疗,能够降低不良反应的发生几率,在一定程度上提高了治疗效果。 Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with gastric and colorectal polyps.Methods:A total of 132 patients with gastric and colorectal polyps treated in a hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were selected divided into two groups,with 66 cases in each group. The routine group was treated with conventional surgery,and the experimental group was treated with endoscopic mucosal resection. The therapeutic effects and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between the routine group and the experimental group.Results:The effective rate of treatment in the experimental group(63 cases,95.45%) was significantly better than that in the routine group(46 cases,69.70%). The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group(2 cases,3.03%) was significantly lower than that in the routine group(16 cases,24.24%). Conclusion:Endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with gastric and colorectal polyps can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and improve the therapeutic effect to some extent.
作者 李恒 Li Heng(Zhengzhou Diantu Medical Laboratory Limited Company,Zhengzhou 450000)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2019年第10期1464-1465,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 内镜下 黏膜切除术 胃及大肠息肉患者 endoscopic mucosal resection stomach and colorectal polyps patients
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献46

  • 1张玲,周晓娟.胃肠道息肉高频电切术后并发消化道出血原因分析及预防[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(9):442-442. 被引量:1
  • 2周平红,姚礼庆,陈巍峰,徐美东,钟芸诗,张轶群,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃巨大平坦病变[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(9):604-607. 被引量:27
  • 3Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for patients with large colorectal tumors[ J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 10 ( 1 ) : 22 - 26.
  • 4Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors-l, 000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute's experiences[ J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27 ( 1 ) : 31 - 39.
  • 5Park JJ, Cheon JH, Kwon JE, et al. Clinical outcomes and factors related to resectability and curability of EMR for early colorectal caneer[J]. GastrointestEndose, 2011, 74(6): 1337-1346.
  • 6Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, Saito Y, et al. Current opinions for endo- scopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tmnors from our experi- ences: indications, technical aspects and complications [ J ]. Dig Endosc, 2012, 24 (Suopl 1): 110-116.
  • 7Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, et al. Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan [ J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 22(9): 1409- 1414.
  • 8Fujishiro M1, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms[J]. Endoscopy, 2006, 38(10) : 1001 - 1006.
  • 9Othman MO, Wallace MB. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 2011, a Western perspective[ J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2011, 35 (4): 288 - 294.
  • 10Lee E J, Lee JB, Lee SH, et al. Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26 ( 8 ) : 2220 - 2230.

共引文献105

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部