期刊文献+

欧洲增值税法中抵扣的“经营目的审查”及其借鉴 被引量:3

The“Business Purpose Test”of VAT Input Credit in Europe and Its Implications in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “经营目的审查”是判断企业支出是否符合经营目的、进而判断支出所含增值税税款能否获得抵扣的方法。若企业支出符合经营目的,则所含增值税可抵扣相关销项税,减轻纳税人的纳税义务。欧洲增值税法将“经营目的审查”确认为抵扣的一般标准,承认其对抵扣限制的限制功能,并通过司法实践,发展出考量纳税人主观意图与客观课税事实的具体规则。我国增值税制度既缺乏抵扣的一般标准,又简单否认易被滥用的支出抵扣资格,容易导致纳税人权益受损。因此,有必要借鉴“经营目的审查”的理念与规则进行调整。 The “Business purpose test” is a method of judging whether a corporate expenditure is carried out for a business purpose, and then determining whether the VAT included in the expenditure is deductible. If a corporate expenditure is carried out for a business purpose, VAT included can be deducted from the related output tax and reduce the taxpayer's tax liability. The VAT in Europe identifies the “Business purpose test” as a general standard for input credit, recognizes its restraining function on the limits of input credit, and develops the specific rules to consider both taxpayers' subjective intentions and objective taxing facts through relatively abundant judicial practice. China's VAT system lacks the general standard of input credit and simply denies the deduction of inputs that can easily be abused, which could easily damage the taxpayers' rights. It is necessary to use the concept and rules of the “business purpose test” to adjust current Chinese VAT rules.
作者 任宛立 Ren Wanli
出处 《交大法学》 CSSCI 2019年第4期120-131,共12页 SJTU Law Review
关键词 欧洲增值税法 进项税抵扣 “经营目的审查” 中国增值税 VAT in Europe Input Credit "Business Purpose Test" VAT in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1冉昊.两大法系法律实施系统比较——财产法律的视角[J].中国社会科学,2006(1):59-71. 被引量:29
  • 2ECJ's judgment of 8 June 2000 in Midland Bank ( Case C - 98/98 ).
  • 3See ECJ's judgment of 3 March 2005 in I/S Fini H ( Case C - 32/03 ).
  • 4See Para. 20 of ECJ's judgment of 15 January 1998 in Ghent Coal Terminal ( Case C - 37/95 ).
  • 5See judgment of 13 March 2008 in Securenta ( Case C -437/06) ;judgment of 22 February 2001 in Abbey (Case C -408/98) ;judgment of 26 May 2005 in Kretztechnik ( Case C - 465/03 ).
  • 6《营改增试点实施办法解读》对第24条的相关解读.
  • 7Luca C . Imposta sul valore aggiunto, diritto a de- trazione e neutralit~ fiscale: profili comunitari e nazionali [ D]. Tesi di dottorato di ricerca in Diritto Tributario Europeo in Facolta di Giurisprudenza di Universitc~ di Bologna,2011:7 -8.
  • 8Salvini L. La detrazione nella sesta direttiva e nell'ordinamento interno: principi generali [ J]. Studi in On- ore di Victor Uckmar Padova, 1997( lI ) :1044.
  • 9Antonio P. Inerenza a11'esercizio d'impresa e detraibilit~t lva: oentamenti giurisprudenziali [ N ]. Ahalex, 2002 - 06 - 12.
  • 10Marco G. II ruolo d'inerenza e le ragioni della detraibilit~t dell'imposta [ J ]. Lo Stato della Fiscalitia dell'Unione Europea (a cura di Di Pietro) , 2003 (I) : 377 - 434.

共引文献17

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部