摘要
既有住宅增设电梯本是一项方便居民生活的政策,然而其实施过程中却往往导致邻里关系趋于紧张。此类纠纷源于各地政府出台的指导意见对增设电梯的投票主体及适用规则未形成一致,对损害补偿不均亦未予回应。既有住宅增设电梯的投票主体应限缩于存在利害关系的本栋业主间,投票比例的确定应在《物权法》第76条和第97条之间进行衡量。选择附条件的“双三分之二比例”更有利于破解现实难题,损害补偿则应体现业主间的差异化需求,如此方能保护少数业主的权益。
Installing elevators in existing residential buildings is originally a policy for the convenience of residents. But it sometimes leads to tensions between neighborhoods during implementation. These disputes originate from the difference of guidelines concerning the voting subjects and applicable rules of installing elevators in the existing resident buildings issued by local governments. And the lack of response to uneven compensation for damage is another cause. The voting subjects of installing elevators in existing residential buildings should be limited to the owners of buildings who have interest relationship in the same building. And the determination of voting majority should be judged between Articles 76 and 97 of the Property Law . To select the conditional “double two-thirds majority” is more conducive to solve practical problems. And the damage compensation should reflect the differentiated needs of owners, so as to protect the rights and interests of minority owners.
作者
吴梓燊
WU Zi-shen(School of Law,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China)
出处
《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2019年第5期466-471,共6页
Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
华侨大学研究生科研创新能力培育计划资助项目(1611309025)
关键词
既有住宅
增设电梯
规范冲突
选择适用
投票主体
损害补偿
existing residential building
installing elevator
rule conflict
selection and application
voting subject
damage compensation