摘要
共享单车随停乱放、侵占城市道路资源的问题催生出单车清除行为的实施。由于单车清除行为在实践中表现为多种样态,因此有必要具体问题具体分析。从行政法角度分析,实践中责令清除车辆行为属于行政命令,限时强制清除车辆和即时强制清除车辆行为均为行政强制执行中的代履行,其实施符合既有的法律。立足于代履行理论,因单车清除行为而产生的费用都应由车辆所属的运营企业承担。
The shared bicycle clearance is required because of the parking problems. Since the clearance is performed in various forms, it is necessary to analyze the specific problems. From the perspective of administrative law the order to clear bicycles is an administrative order, and instant mandatory clearance and time-limited mandatory clearance are administrative substitutive fulfillment, all of which comply with the law.Based on the theory of administrative substitutive fulfillment, the expenses of clearance should be undertaken by operative companies.
作者
周苏湘
ZHOU Su-xiang(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211189)
出处
《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2019年第8期51-57,95,共8页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
共享单车
强制清除
代履行
行政辅助人
shared bicycle
mandatory clearance
substitutive fulfillment
administrative assistant