期刊文献+

中蒙两国知识产权民事司法协助之考量与推进

Consideration and Promotion of Judicial Assistance in Civil Matters on Intellectual Property Rights between China and Mongolia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民事司法协助是解决中蒙两国知识产权纠纷和优化中蒙两国交往环境的必要保障。中蒙两国具有开展知识产权民事司法协助之政治前提、经济需求与法律基础。目前,中蒙知识产权民事司法协助之基本法律框架业已形成。中蒙两国日益频繁的政治、经济和文化往来,要求两国以维护国家主权、平等互利及保护合法权益为基本原则,进一步规范和完善民事司法协助机制,为两国司法协助营造良好的制度环境。具体来说应当在以下几个方面作出努力:细化协助条约,明确协助程序;拓宽协助领域,扩展协助空间;优化协助形式,提高协助效率;规范协助机关,培养协助人才。 Judicial assistance in civil matters is a necessary guarantee for solving the intellectual property disputes and for optimizing the communication environment between China and Mongolia.Two countries have common political premise,economic demand and legal basis for judicial assistance in civil matters on intellectual property rights.At present, the basic legal framework for such judicial assistance between China and Mongolia has been formed.The increasingly frequent political,economic and cultural exchanges between two countries require them to take safeguarding national sovereignty,equality and mutual benefit and protecting legitimate rights and interests as the basic principles to further standardize and improve the mechanism of judicial assistance in civil matters and create an enabling institutional environment for judicial assistance between the two countries.Specifically speaking,efforts should be made in the following aspects: elaborating assistance treaties and clarifying assistance procedures;broadening assistance and expanding the space for assistance;optimizing the form of assistance and improving the efficiency of assistance;standardizing assistance authorities and cultivating assistance talents.
作者 郝海燕 HAO Hai-yan(Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics,Hohhot 010070,China;Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处 《内蒙古财经大学学报》 2019年第5期145-149,共5页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics
基金 中蒙俄经济走廊研究协同创新中心重点项目(ZMEZ201902)
关键词 中蒙两国 知识产权 民事司法协助 China and Mongolia intellectual property rights judicial assistance in civil matters
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1段东辉.论我国民商事域外取证的立法和实践[J].政法论坛,1998,16(5):103-108. 被引量:3
  • 2Fang Shen.Are you Prepared for Legal Maze? How to Serve Legal Document,Obtain Evidence and Enforce Judgments in China[J].UMKC L.Rev.Vol.72,2003.
  • 3董丽萍,刘国明.我国司法协助实践的发展及问题[EB/OL].http://www.hicourt.gov.cn,2008-05-20.
  • 4最高人民法院(法办[2003]297号).
  • 5the Permanent Bureau, Synopsis of Responses to the Questionnaire of May 2008 Relating to The Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters, 15 December 2008 , http://www, hcch. net, February 10, 2009.
  • 6The Permanent Bureau, Synopsis of the Replies to the Questionnaire Relating to the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil Or Commercial Matters, http://www, hcch. net, October 10, 2007.
  • 7The Permanent Bureau, Summary of Responses to the Questionnaire Relating to the Evidence Convention, With Analytical Comments, http:// www. hcch. net, February. 10. 2009.
  • 8北京市高级人民法院关于民商事国际司法协助工作的若干规定,http://www.1awyee.net/Act/,2008-03-20.
  • 9Explanatory Report by Ph. W. Amram, http://www, hcch. net, May 1, 2007.
  • 10Status Table of the Hague Evidence Convention, http://www, hcch. net, March 31, 2009.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部