期刊文献+

基于语义差别和模糊综合评判的公园景观美学评价——以济南泉城公园为例 被引量:4

Research on Park Landscape Aesthetics Evaluation Based on Semantic Differential-fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation——Taking Quancheng Park of Jinan for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章采用语义差别(SD)法,从形态描述、整体感受、心理感受和环境生态四方面构建了公园景观美学评价指标体系,并运用模糊综合评判对泉城公园"松风飞瀑"景点美学效果进行了评价.结果表明,评判者认为该景点很美、较美、一般、较差和很差的隶属度分别为26.13%、37.52%、23.00%、8.64%和4.71%,评价结果和公众感觉较为一致,说明该方法对公园景观美学评价有较好的适用性. Using the method of semantic difference (SD), this paper makes a evaluation index system of park landscape aesthetics was constructed from four aspects form description, overall feeling, psychological feeling and environment ecology. The aesthetic effect of scenic spot"Song Feng Fei Pu"in Quancheng Park was evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The results show that the percentages of the respondents who think the scenic spot is very beautiful, beautiful, general, poor and very poor are 26.13%, 37.52%,23%,8.64% and 4.71%,respectively .The evaluation result is consistent with the public feeling which shows that this method is applicable to the evaluation of park landscape aesthetics.
作者 马琳 刘兵 乔姝函 Ma Lin;Liu Bing;Qiao Shuhan
出处 《建筑与文化》 2019年第10期121-122,共2页 Architecture & Culture
基金 山东省高等学校科技计划(项目编号:320194) 山东农业大学青年科技创新基金(项目编号:23782)资助
关键词 公园景观 美学评价 语义差别法 模糊综合评判 park Landscape aesthetic evaluation semantic difference fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献154

共引文献286

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部