期刊文献+

在线评论情感对消费者感知风险的影响研究

Research on the Impact of Online Comment Sentiment on Consumer Perceived Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章从在线评论的情感倾向、情感强度、情感转折三个视角,实证研究了不同情感倾向下情感强度和涉及度对消费者感知风险的交互作用以及转折性情感评论对消费者感知风险的影响。结果发现,涉及度在情感强度对消费者感知风险的影响中具有调节作用。转折性正面情感评论对消费者感知风险的影响高于正面评论的影响,而转折性负面评论与负面评论对消费者感知风险的影响并没有显著差异。 From the three perspectives of emotional tendency, emotional intensity and emotional turning point of online reviews, this paper empirically studies the interaction of emotional intensity and involvement degree on consumers' perceived risk under different emotional tendencies and the impact of emotional turning point on consumers' perceived risk. The results show that involvement degree plays a moderating role in the impact of emotional intensity on consumers' perceived risk. The impact of turning positive emotional comment on consumer perceived risk is higher than that of positive comment, while there is no significant difference between turning negative comment and negative comment on consumer perceived risk.
作者 王家辉 夏志杰 阮文翠 WANG Jiahui;XIA Zhijie;RUAN Wencui(School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201600, China)
出处 《科学与管理》 2019年第5期60-66,共7页 Science and Management
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(14BTQ026) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71503163)
关键词 在线评论 评论情感 感知风险 online reviews reviews emotion perceived risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1Otnes C., Lowrey, T. M., Shrum, L. J.. Toward an Understand- ing of Consumer Ambivalence. Journal of Consumer Research, 1997, 24(3): 80-93.
  • 2Zemborain, M. R., Johar, G. V.. Attitudinal Ambivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influ- ence. Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, 33(March): 506-514.
  • 3Rook, Dennis, Robert J. Fisher. Normative Influences on Im- pulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 1995, 22(December): 305-313.
  • 4Williams, P., Aaker., J. L.. Can Mixed Emotions Coexist. Jour- nal of Consumer Research, 2002, 28(March): 636-649.
  • 5Cavazza, N., Butebra, F.. Bending without Breaking: Examin- ing the Role of Attitudinal Ambivalence in Resisting Persua- sive Communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 38: 1-15.
  • 6Armitage, C. J., Conner, M.. Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26: 1421-1432.
  • 7Bassili, J. N.. Meta-judgmental Versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes: The Case of Measures of Attitude Strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(3): 637-653.
  • 8Hodson, G., Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M.. The Role of Attitudinal Ambivalence in Susceptibility to Consensus Information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2001, 23(3): 197-205.
  • 9Jonas, K., Broemer, P., Diehl, M.. Attitudinal Ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 2000, 11: 35-74.
  • 10Rosenberg, M., C. Hoveland. Cognitive, Affective and Behav- ioral Components of Attitudes. In M. Rosenberg, et al., eds.. Attitude Organization and Change. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1960.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部