摘要
有一种观点认为,康德否认行为主体在两个非道德目的之间进行选择时有自由可言。亨利·E·阿利森反对这种解读,并基于其“结合论”观点,主张康德那里存在一种非道德自由。虽然阿利森的结论正确,但是他并没有提供理解“一种有限的但却是真正的自发性”的真正说明。事实上,非道德选择的自由属性奠基于一种冷漠的自由概念上。
There is a view that Kant do not think that there are free choices between nonmoral ends.Henry Allison shows objection to this reading,argued for the existence of a concept of nonmoral freedom in Kant based on Incorporation thesis.Allison came to a correct conclusion,but he failed to give us real reason to understand the"genuine,albeit limited and spontaneity".In fact,free attribute of nonmoral choices is based on the notion of indifferent freedom.
作者
邵贤曼
Shao Xianman(Social Sciences in China Press,Chaoyang District Beijing 100026,China)
出处
《衡阳师范学院学报》
2019年第4期48-52,共5页
Journal of Hengyang Normal University
关键词
康德
非道德选择
冷漠的自由
Kant
nonmoral choices
indifferent freedom