摘要
目的:调查优良学风班大学生心理健康状况,为建设先进班集体提供依据。方法:运用症状自评量表(SCL-90)对某高校2016~2018年“优良学风班”和对照组班级进行测试,分析两者差异。结果:“优良学风班”SCL-90各因子得分与对照组学生差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),优良学风班男大学生的总分和强迫症状、焦虑、恐怖、精神病性4个因子与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),优良学风班女大学生的总分和躯体化、强迫症状、抑郁、焦虑、恐怖、精神病性和其他7个因子与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),优良学风班非独生子女除躯体化因子外,其余均与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),优良学风班农村生源大学生的总分和10个因子与对照组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:优良学风班学生与对照组的症状自评量表(SCL-90)测试结果存在差异,且在性别、是否为独生子女和生源地维度上存在差异。
Objective: To investigate the mental health status of students in the class awarded with excellence of study style by a college authority for evidence to construct advanced classes. Methods :Students from the class awarded with excellence of study style from 2016 to 2018 by a college authority received measurement with Symptom Checklist 90(SCL-90),and another class was included as controls and subjected to the similar measurement.Then two classes were compared for the differences in study style. Results :The two classes were significantly different in the scoring on each component of SCL-90( P< 0.05),particularly in total scores on obsessive-compulsive symptom,anxiety,fear and psychoticism in males,and female,the total scores on somatization,obsessive-compulsive symptoms,depression,anxiety,fear and psychoticism in females(Both P< 0.05).The difference was also significant for students from non-only child family except for the scoring on somatization and those from rural villages in total scoring on the 10 components between groups(Both P< 0.05 ). Conclusion :SCL-90 measurement indicates that students from the class awarded with excellence of study style are different from the control subjects,particularly the difference in genders,students from non-only child family or from rural villages.
作者
崔晓霞
汪国瑞
杨积芳
吴欢
CUI Xiaoxia;WANG Guorui;YANG Jifang;WU Huan(School of Laboratory Medicine,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241002,China)
出处
《皖南医学院学报》
CAS
2019年第5期482-485,共4页
Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金
安徽高校人文社会科学研究项目(SK2016A094)
关键词
大学生
SCL-90
心理健康状况
优良学风班
college students
Symptom Checklist 90
mental health status
class of good study style