摘要
人格权独立成编问题本质上是立法技术问题。无论是否支持人格权独立成编,学者们均强调人格权的重要性。人格权是存在于主体自身的权利,不存在因一定法律事实而发生、变更、消灭的情形,因此不具备分则要求的事实要素。我国人格权立法所形成的经验并非是人格权独立成编,而是“权利确认+侵权救济”的立法模式。从科学整理民事法律规范和传承立法经验的角度考量,应继续延续这种二分的立法模式。
The issue of independent compilation of personality right is essentially a issue of legislative technique. Whether or not to support the independent compilation of personality right, scholars emphasize the importance of personality right. Personality right is the right that exists in the subject itself. It won’t occur, change, or eliminate due to certain legal facts. Therefore, it doesn’t have the factual elements required by the sub-rules. The experience of the legislation of personality right in China is not the independent compilation of personality right, but the legislative model of “right recognition and infringement relief”. From the perspective of scientifically sorting out civil legal norms and inheriting legislative experience, this legislative model should be continued.
作者
何金璞
HE Jin-pu(College of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing,210093,China)
出处
《山西青年职业学院学报》
2019年第3期50-53,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College
关键词
人格权
民法典
立法技术
侵权责任
personality right
civil code
legislative technique
tort liability