期刊文献+

论作为权利的童年

Childhood as Children’s Right
原文传递
导出
摘要 从工业革命时期的儿童拯救话语到20世纪《儿童权利公约》的最终确立,童年作为一项权利得到了国际社会的普遍确认。由《儿童权利公约》勾勒的童年图景,即童年是健康的、自由的、幸福的,童年是免于经济责任的,童年的任务是发展等可知,童年是一项自决权利,亦是一项福利权利。作为权利的童年暗含如下悖论:无法克服儿童-成人二元论,无法平衡保护优先与自决优先,无法协调文化通约性与文化差异性。鉴于此,成人应当尊重儿童作为童年的拥有者与界定者,鼓励儿童塑造与丰富童年文化。 From children saving in the Western Industrial Revolution to the establishment of Convention of the Rights of the Child in 20th century, childhood as children ’ s right has been accepted internationally. According to Convention of the Rights of the Child, childhood should be healthy, free, happy, and exempt from financial responsibility. Childhood is development, a right of self-determination and welfare. The inherent paradox of the concept of childhood seen as children’s right lie in the following aspects: unavoidable and hard to overcome the dualism of children and adults, the contradiction between priority of protection and priority of autonomy, and the cultural compatibility and cultural differences. Therefore, adults should respect children as owners and dcfincrs of their own childhood. Children should be encouraged to shape and enrich their childhood culture.
作者 郑素华 Zheng Suhua(Hangzhou College fo r Kindergarten Teachers,Zhejiang Normal University,Hangzhou,310012)
出处 《幼儿教育(教育科学)》 2019年第7期16-20,共5页 Early Childhood Education(Educational Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“国外童年社会学的当代进展研究”的研究成果之一,项目批准号:12CSH001
关键词 权利 童年 儿童 《儿童权利公约》 right childhood children Convention of the Rights of the Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1韦禾.儿童的权利——一个世界性的新课题——中国履行《儿童权利公约》研讨会综述[J].教育研究,1996,17(8):76-79. 被引量:20
  • 2谭旭东.论童年的历史建构与价值确立[J].涪陵师范学院学报,2006,22(6):17-24. 被引量:5
  • 3N. Folbre, "Children as Public Goods", The American Economic Review, Vol .84, No.2, 1994, pp. 120-125.
  • 4Gcsta Esping-Andersen, Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 1990.
  • 5OECD, The Social Expenditure Database: An Interpretive Guide, 2007, http ://www. oecd. orgy/ els/soeial/expenditure.
  • 6OECD, http ://www. oecd. org/els/social/expenditure.
  • 7Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), http://www, lisproject, org/keyfigures, htm.
  • 8LABORSTA, http ://laborsta. ilo. org.
  • 9I. Holliday & P. Wilding, Welfare Capitalism in East Asia : Social Policy in the Tiger Economies, NewYork : Palgrave Macmillan, 2003,pp. 30 - 52.
  • 10A. Myrdal, Nation and Family, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968,pp. 133-153.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部