從敦煌本《文選》殘卷看李善注底本的“舊注”

The Research on the Old Notes of Li Shaul Annotations on the Respective of the Fragment of WenXuan Found in DunHuang

李善注《文選》版本研究是“選學”研究的重點之一,但是長期以來,人們對《文選》李善注與“舊注”之間的關係卻很少措意,一般認爲李善《文選》“舊注”爲李善援引或節引。敦煌本《文選》以其分明的體例,區分了李善注與“舊注”,説明李善注底本一些文章原有“舊注”的事實。敦煌本《文選》保存的李善注釋體例,在刻本中卻變得“漫無界限”。李善《文選》注底本一些篇章有“舊注”的事實被掩蓋,這與李善自敍其注釋體例的被忽視、刻本的訛亂及敦煌本《文選》長久湮没密切相關。

The study of the versions of Li Shan's Annotations of WenXuan is one of the focuses of the study of WenXuan, but for a long time, the relationship between Li Shan's Annotations and the old note is rarely noticed. Generally considered, the old notes included in Li Shan's Annotations of WenXuan are cited. WenXuan founded in DunHuang distinguish Li Shan's annotations and the old note with its distinct style, and also prove that the original version used by Li Shan inclued the old note. The style of Li Shan's Annotations in WenXuan are ambiguous. The reality that some article owning the old notes in the original version used by Li Shan is concealed, which is the result of the neglection about the Annotations'tyle narrated by Li Shan, the mistakes in the versions and the long annihilation of WenXuan founded in DunHuang.