期刊文献+

《论持久战》的各方反响 被引量:6

On Protracted War and Its Receptions form All Sides
原文传递
导出
摘要 全面抗战爆发后,持久战成为举国共识,可是国共两党的持久战思想却有着显著差异。针对国民党一味强调精神致胜和服从领袖以及专守防御的军事战略,共产党更加着重于动员和武装民众,及其以运动战为主,游击战、阵地战为辅的战略方针。《论持久战》问世后,得到社会各界的积极反响。后来国民党积极反共,社会各方表面称引国民政府的持久战主张,实则对《论持久战》的呼应仍是持久战舆论的稳定内核。包括作为重要补充的经济论述,也以《论持久战》为依据或参照。 With the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War, a protracted war as expectation became a broad consensus in China. However, the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) and the Kuomintang(KMT)differed considerably on its interpretations. The KMT emphasized optimism and obedience to the leader as the key to success, while the CCP thought highly of mobilizing and arming the masses. In terms of military strategy, the KMT only focused on defense, whereas the CCP identified mobile warfare as priority and supplemented it with guerrilla warfare and positional warfare. Mao Zedong’s On Protracted War soon became influential after publication. Considering the KMT’s anti-Communist attitude, public discussions responded to the book in the disguise of advocating the Nationalist government’s propaganda about protracted war.Even economic argument took the book as basis or reference.
作者 桑兵 SANG Bing
机构地区 浙江大学历史系
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第9期169-184,共16页 Academic Monthly
关键词 《论持久战》 毛泽东 舆论 国共 On Protracted War Mao Zedong public discussions the Chinese Communist Party the Kuomintang
  • 相关文献

同被引文献176

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部