期刊文献+

小国对外战略的逻辑与偏好分析:以波罗的海三国为例——兼论波罗的海三国对华关系和政策的演变 被引量:9

Analysis of the Logic and Preference of Small Countries’ Diplomatic Strategy: A Case Study of the Three Baltic States——Also on the Evolution of Their Relations and Policies towards China
原文传递
导出
摘要 小国特别是地缘政治支轴小国在国际体系中的地位与作用日益显著。梳理波罗的海三国对华关系的发展脉络表明,小国对外战略具有可塑、变动、务实的特点,从而存在影响、转变甚至塑造小国外交政策的可能性与潜在空间。比较分析波罗的海三国对华关系与中国观显示,经济联系的加深会提升政治关注度,但并不一定促成政治认可度的提升以及对他国认知单向趋好的结果。此外,结合波罗的海三国的外交行为偏好,本文认为在与小国发展关系和开展合作时应侧重地区多边合作平台,同时兼顾双边关系的发展,注重专长外交理念的应用,并加强公共外交和人文领域交流。善用小国在地缘博弈中所能发挥的作用,将更有力地推动“一带一路”建设,促进“人类命运共同体”的构建。 Along with the significant changes unseen in 100 years for international community,small countries,especially those countries as geopolitical axis have played an increasingly important role in the international system.In terms of the relations between China and key small countries like Estonia,Latvia and Lithuania,we can see that the diplomatic strategy of small countries is characterized by plasticity,chang ability and pragmatism.Hence,there is plenty of potential space and possibility to influence,transform and even shape the foreign policy of small countries.By comparing and analyzing the relationship between the three countries of the Baltic Sea and China,it is clear that the deepening of economic ties will increase political attention,but it may not enhance the mutual political trust and the positive recognition of the other side.In addition,combining the preference of small countries like Estonia,Latvia and Lithuania,this paper argues that we should focus on regional multilateral cooperation platforms when developing relations and cooperation with small countries.Moreover,we should take into account the development of bilateral relations,pay attention to the application of expertise diplomacy and enhance the public diplomacy and cultural exchange.Indeed,making good use of the role that small countries can play in the geopolitical game will promote the construction of the “Belt and Road Initiative”as well as the community of shared future for mankind.
作者 张艳璐 Zhang Yanlu
出处 《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》 CSSCI 2019年第5期55-73,156,共20页 Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献70

  • 1方军祥,李波.西方国际关系理论中小国概念分析[J].国际论坛,2005,7(4):38-42. 被引量:12
  • 2俞正樑.试论美国对华的对冲战略[J].国际观察,2006(1):2-8. 被引量:10
  • 3Niels Amstrup, "The Perennial Problem of Small States: A Survey of Research Efforts," Cooperation and Conflict, XI, 1976, p. 165.
  • 4Otmar Holl, ed., Small States in Europe and Dependence, Wilhelm Braumuller 1983, p. 35.
  • 5[美]汉斯·摩根索.《国家间政治:权力斗争与和平》,徐昕、郝望、李保平译,北京大学出版社2006年版.
  • 6Jonathan H. Ping, Middle Power Statecraft : Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific, England and USA : Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2005, p. 51.
  • 7Adam Chapnick, "The Middle Power," Canadian Foreign Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, Winter 1999, pp. 73- 82.
  • 8Hans Geser, "Wasist Eigentlich Ein Kleinstaat?" in KirtRomain&WaschkuhnArno, ed., Kleinstaaten-Kon- tinent Europa: Probleme und Perspektiven. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001, S. 89-100.
  • 9Iver B. Neumann and SieglindeGstahl, " Lilliputians in Gulliver's World? Small States in International Relations," Center for Small States Studies, University of Iceland, Working Paper 1-2004.
  • 10RaimoVayrynen, "On the Definition and Measurement of Small Power Status," Cooperation and Conflict, VI, 1971, pp.92-93.

共引文献97

同被引文献114

引证文献9

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部