期刊文献+

Using Leading Indicators to Improve Project Performance Measurement

原文传递
导出
摘要 Project performance measurement offers a wide range of methods to help project managers monitor projects.However,several critical issues remain in project performance measurement,such as an unbalanced use of indicators due to a lack of prediction-based (leading) indicators with regard to outcome-based (lagging) indicators.For its part,systems engineering measurement,although a more recent discipline,offers a wide variety of indicators,including a set of leading indicators.As our objective is to increase project performance and success rates,this involves improving project performance measurement on which project management decisions are based.This purpose,the proposal put forward in this paper is to extend the number and type of indicators used in project performance measurement by adapting the leading indicators defined in systems engineering measurement.The methodology involves first mapping the systems engineering indicators with the project management activities,resulting in identification of a set of potentially useful indicators for measuring the different activities,then tailoring a selection of these indicators with project-specific data to define a set of the most relevant indicators for a given project.This methodology is illustrated by means of a case study in a manufacturing company.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2019年第5期529-554,共26页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviews for their help to improve the quality of the paper. The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under grants 71690230, 71690235 and 71501055.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献47

  • 1agilemanifesto.org. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Available via DIALOG. http ://agilemanifesto.org/.
  • 2Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • 3Aumann, R. & Serrano, R. (2008). An economic index of riskiness. Journal of Political Economy, 116:810-836.
  • 4Bertsimas, D. & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52: 35-53.
  • 5Brgmzei, R., Ferrari, G., Fragnelli, V. & Tijs, S. (2002). Two approaches to the problem of sharing delay costs in joint projects. Annals of Operations Research, 109:359-374.
  • 6Brown, D.B. & Sim, M. (2009). Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Science, 55:71-84.
  • 7Cai, X., Hall, N.G. & Zhang, F. (2012). Cooperation and contract design in project management. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • 8Castro, J., Gemez, D. & Tejada, J. (2008). A polynomial rule for the problem of sharing delay costs in PERT networks. Computers & Operations Research, 35:2376-2387.
  • 9Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research-Technology Management, 43: 18-33.
  • 10Corbett, C. & Muthulingam, S. (2007). Adoption of voluntary environmental standards: the role of signaling and intrinsic benets in the diffusion of the LEED green building standards. Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部