期刊文献+

从“等待失败”到“干预反应”:数学学习障碍评估干预体系新范式 被引量:1

From “Wait to Fail” to “Response to Intervention”: New Paradigm of Identification and Intervention System of Mathematical Learning Disabilities
原文传递
导出
摘要 干预反应(response to intervention,RTI)模型是一个使用干预、评估以及基于数据的决策制定的多层级支持系统,主要用于学习障碍学生的预防和鉴别。在美国,干预反应模型的实施框架主要有系统RTI改革、嵌入式RTI及动态评估三种。系统RTI改革是最为复杂的三层级实施框架,受限于干预项目覆盖领域的局限性以及评估方式的不一致性;嵌入式RTI植根于普通教室,将三个层级的框架体系缩减为更有效的两个层级,但其成功实施基于高质量的普通教室教学;相较而言,动态评估是用以鉴定数学学习障碍的最有效的RTI实施框架。干预反应模型的发展折射出美国教育评估和改革的新趋势,反映了拒绝“等待失败”、评估与干预相融合、循证实践的理念导向。 Response to intervention(RTI)is a multi-tiered system of supports that uses interventions,assessments,and data-based decision making for the prevention and identification of students with learning disabilities.Three frameworks for operationalizing RTI as a means of identifying mathematical learning disabilities are Systemic RTI Reform,Embedded RTI,and Dynamic Assessment.Systemic RTI Reform is the most complex framework that suffers from the paucity of available validated mathematics intervention and inconsistency of assessment methods.Embedded RTI is situated in the general classroom requiring highquality general education instruction.Dynamic Assessment is the most efficient of the three frameworks for assessing a student's response to the quality instruction.The development of the RTI model reflects the new trend in American education reform and educational assessment.Implications for identifying students'mathematical learning disabilities in China are provided.
作者 朱楠 王艳 ZHU Nan;WANG Yan(School of Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan,430079;Shandong Vocational College of Special Education,Jinan,250022)
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第9期57-63,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 国家社会科学“十二五”规划2015年度教育学青年课题“融合教育背景下特殊教育学校教师专业发展的内容和途径:基于教师角色变革的视角”(项目编号:CHA150176)的阶段性成果
关键词 干预反应模型 系统RTI改革 嵌入式RTI 动态评估 数学学习障碍评估 Response to intervention systemic RTI reform embedded RTI dynamic assessment mathematics learning disabilities classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1Griglths Amy - Jane, Parson B I~rien, Bums Mat- thew K, et al. Response to intervention research for practice. Alexandria: National Association of State Di- rectors of Special Education, Inc, 2007.1.
  • 2Gresham M F. Responsiveness to intervention: an alternative approach to the identification of learning dis- abifities. In: I_earning disabilities summit: building a foundation for the future white papers (2001). http:// www. nrcld, org/resources/ldsunmait/gresham, html, 2011 - 08-06.
  • 3Griffiths Amy - Jane, Parson B Lorien, BumsMatthew K, et al. Response to intervention research for practice. Alexandria: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc, 2007.1.
  • 4Scull Janie, Winkler M Amber. Shifting trends in spe- cial education ( 2011 ). In: Fordham institute paper. http://www, edexcellence, net/publications - issues/ publications/shifting- trends- in- special, html, 2011 - 08 - 02.
  • 5Westat and Abt Associates. Design of the national as- sessment of progress under the Individuals with Disabil- ities Education Improvement Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2007. http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/ edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 6Harr- Robins J J, Shambaugh L S, Parrish T. The sta- tus of state- level response to intervention policies and procedures in the West Region states and five other states (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009 - No. 077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Educa- tion, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Re- gional Educational Laboratory West, 2009. http://ies. ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 7Bocala C, Mello D, Reedy K, et al. Features of state response to intervention initiatives in Northeast and Is- lands Region states (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009- No. 083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assis- tance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands, 2009. http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 8Detgen A, Yamashita M, Davis B, et al. State policies and procedures on response to intervention in the Mid- west Region. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011 - No. 116). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Ed- ucation, Institute of Education Sciences, National Cen- ter for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwes, 2011. Re- trieved from http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 -01.
  • 9NCR1T. About the national center on response to intervention, http : / / www . rti4success . org/ aboutus , 2011 - 08 - 08.
  • 10NASDSE. Response to intervention (RtI) project, http:// www. nasdse, org/Projects/Responseto Intervention RtI- Project/tabid/411/Default. aspx,2011 - 08 - 12.

共引文献28

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部