期刊文献+

剖宫产瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Delivery Mode of Cesarean Scar Uterus With Second Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及经阴道分娩结局进行临床分析。方法回顾性分析我院2015年1月-2017年12月收治的剖宫产瘢痕子宫再次妊娠且经阴道分娩产妇40例、再次剖宫产分娩者40例的临床资料,分别设为阴道分娩组、再次剖宫产组,分析两组围产期指标及产后并发症发生情况数据差异。结果阴道分娩组产时出血量、产后2h出血量均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);阴道分娩组新生儿Apgar1min评分稍高于再次剖宫产组(P>0.05);阴道分娩组产后出血率、产褥感染率,新生儿窒息率均稍低于再次剖宫产组(P>0.05)。结论在瘢痕子宫再次妊娠选择分娩方式时,把握指征后选择阴道分娩的方式能够取得更加显著的效果,可以显著改善产妇的产后出血量,有较高的应用价值和推广价值。 Objective To analyze the choice of delivery mode of uterus scar pregnancy after cesarean section and the outcome of vaginal delivery. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 40 cases of cesarean section scar uterus re-pregnancy and vaginal delivery and 40 cases of cesarean section delivery were performed in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017. The vaginal delivery group and the cesarean section group were used to analyze the differences in perinatal index and postpartum complications between the two groups. Results The amount of bleeding during birth and the amount of bleeding after delivery were significantly lower in the vaginal delivery group than in the cesarean section group (P < 0.05). The Apgar 1 min score in the vaginal delivery group was slightly higher than that in the cesarean section group (P > 0.05). The vaginal delivery group postpartum hemorrhage rate, puerperal infection rate, neonatal asphyxia rate were slightly lower than the cesarean section group (P > 0.05).Conclusion In the scar uterus re-pregnancy selection of delivery mode, the choice of vaginal delivery after the indication can achieve more significant results, can significantly improve maternal postpartum hemorrhage and complication rate, has a higher application value and promotion value.
作者 吴帼蕴 WU Guoyun(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Nanjing Red Cross Hospital,Jiangsu Province,Nanjing Jiangsu 210001,China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第19期37-39,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 瘢痕子宫 分娩方式 阴道分娩 剖宫产 新生儿Apgar评分 并发症 scar uterus mode of delivery vaginal delivery cesarean section neonatal Apgar score complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献117

  • 1Lumbiganon P,LaopaiboonM,GülmezogluAM,Method ofdelivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia:theWHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J].Lancet,2010,375(9713):490.
  • 2Betran AP,MerialdiM,Lauer JAetal·Rates of caesarean section:analysis ofgloba,l regional and national estimates[J].Paediatr Perina Epidemio,l,2007,21(2):98.
  • 3曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.2170-2172.
  • 4王蔚.剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择与新生儿结局的临床研究[J].第四军医大学学报,2007,28(22):2085-2087. 被引量:31
  • 5李燕蓉,梁竹巍,贾晓芳.北京天坛医院20年间剖宫产率变化及分析[J].武警医学,2007,18(12):916-918. 被引量:5
  • 6Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth AfterPrevious Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01) [2016-05-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/.
  • 7National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline 132[M].Manchester: NICE, 2011.
  • 8Sentilhes L, Vayssi^re C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery forwomen with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinicalpractice from the French College of Gynecologists andObstetricians (CNGOF)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Heprod Biol,2013,170(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015.
  • 9Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginalbirth after Caesarean section[J]. Best Pract Res Clin ObstetGynaecol, 2005,19(1):117-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015.
  • 10American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOGPractice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previouscesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt 1):450-456. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.

共引文献392

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部