证据法学维度下污染环境罪的罪过形式

The Form of Crime of Environmental Pollution under the Dimension of Evidence Law

在规范论的角度下对污染环境罪的罪过形式进行分析,其结果是相关论者各持己见、互不退让,这于司法实践并无裨益。与其陷入无止境的理论争讼中,倒不如从解决问题的角度出发,采用证据学的思维来确定该罪的责任形式问题。任何犯罪的主观要件都存在证明困难的问题,从证据学的角度来讲,有必要承认污染环境罪的双重罪过形式。在本罪中,实际上是故意犯罪适用了过失犯罪的法定刑,虽然可能导致重罪轻判,但绝不会导致轻罪重判。

From the perspective of normative analysis of the form of the crime of pollution of the environment,leading to scholars to hold their own views,do not yield,which is not conducive to judicial practice. Instead of getting into endless theoretical disputes,we should start from the perspective of solving problems and adopt the evidentiary thinking to determine the form of liability of this crime. It is difficult to prove the subjective elements of any crime. From the point of view of evidentiary science,it is necessary to admit the double form of environmental pollution crime. In this crime,in fact,intentional crime applies to the statutory punishment of negligent crime,although it may lead to a misdemeanor sentence,but will never lead to a misdemeanor sentence.