我国仲裁协议效力异议提出期限问题研究

A Study on the Validity of Arbitration Agreement in China

仲裁协议的效力直接关系到纠纷的解决方式,我国《仲裁法》规定仲裁协议的效力异议应在“首次开庭前”提出,然而部分被申请人以此拖延仲裁程序、转移涉案财产。为了避免恶意异议带来的执行难等问题,我国司法实践中已逐步认可异议期应缩至答辩期内,而当代仲裁立法、仲裁规则,是以“首次提交实体答辩前”为普遍趋势,故在比较分析后,建议应将我国《仲裁法》第20条的“首次开庭前”修改为“首次提交实体答辩前”。

The validity of arbitration agreement is directly related to the settlement of disputes.The arbitration law of our country stipulates that the objection to the validity of the arbitration agreement should be raised before the first hearing. However,some of the respondents delayed the arbitration proceedings and transferred the property involved.In order to avoid problems such as difficulties in implementation caused by malicious objections. In the judicial practice of our country,the period of acceptance of dissent should be reduced to the period of defense. And contemporary arbitration legislation and arbitration rules, the general trend is "before submitting the substantive reply for the first time". After a comparative analysis of the objection deadline, it is suggested that the "before the first hearing" of Article 20 of the Arbitration Law of China should be amended to "before submitting the substantive reply for the first time".