司马迁生年十年之差百年论争梳理学术研讨会综述

Review of the Academic Seminar on Carding of Sima Qian’s Birth Year’s Controversy over the Difference of Ten Years

司马迁生年,是一个千年疑案。北京史记研究会举行司马迁生年十年之差百年论争梳理学术研讨会。会议认为,司马迁生年十年之差的数字讹误,有五种可能;司马迁生年为前145年,有14条证据;“前135年说”论者循环论证,其源无一考据,其流无一实证,不能成立;王应麟《玉海》“汉史记”条《正义》佚文的所谓“铁证”,是一条伪证;排比行年,科学论证,对司马迁生年作出阶段性结论:司马迁生年“两说”,只存在于《史记》“三家注”;百年论争,王真郭伪不并存,司马迁生于前145年,可以作为定论。《综述》还简略追述了2016—2018年间第三次全国学术界关于司马迁生年十年之差论争的情况。

The birth year of Sima Qian is the controversy for thousand years.The academic seminar of Sima Qian’s birth year’s controversy over the difference of ten years was held by Beijing Sima Qian Research Society.The seminar came to the conclusion that the difference about the ten years on his birth year has the five possibilities.Sima Qian’s birth year is 145 BC which can be proved by 14 evidences;“assertion of 135 BC” is the circular argumentation and it is fake and the fabrication of historical facts;it’s the false evidence in Yu Hai written by Wang Yinglin,who advanced the so-called evidence in the entry “Rectification of Historical Records of Han Dynasty”;listing his performances is scientific to make the periodical conclusion of his birth year;the different birth year only exists in Three Scholars’ Connotation of Historical Records;Wang’s assertion and Guo’s assertion cannot mutually exist,so the birth year,145 BC,can be the final conclusion.The review briefly traces back to the third national seminar about the controversy over the difference of ten years in 2016-2018.