摘要
语言类型的差异,导致藏缅语工具状语标记在编码模式、功能分布上呈现出一定的个性差异。这些差异与语言自身所处的分析性特点是对应的,是分析性不同类型特征的具体表现。通过比较发现,藏语支、彝语支工具状语的句法手段是处于两个极端的“最简”模式,而羌语支、景颇语支、缅语支则处于分析性连续统上的中间环节。
The differences of language types lead to certain differences of individual languages in coding patterns as well as the function and distribution of instrumental adverbial markers in Tibeto-Burman languages.These differences are consistent with the analytic characteristics of each individual language,which are specific representations of typological characteristics of the different types along the analyticity scale of Tibeto-Burman languages.Through comparison,it is found that the syntactic devices of instrumental adverbials in languages of the Tibetan and Yi branches reflect the“simplest modes”on the two respective extremes of the analyticity scale,while languages of the Qiang,Jingpo and Burmish branches represent the intermediate types along the analyticity continuum.
出处
《民族语文》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期58-71,共14页
Minority Languages of China
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“藏缅语方式状语语法形式的类型及历史演变”(14BYY136)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
藏缅语
工具状语
句法手段
分析性类型
Tibeto-Burman languages
instrumental adverbial
syntactic devices
types of analytic languages