论行政规范性文件附带审查的后续处理

On the Follow-up Processing of Incidental Review of Administrative Normative Documents

行政规范性文件被认定为违法后,由于法院认定方式本身对制定机关缺乏法律拘束力,再加上向制定机关提出的司法建议缺乏强制执行力等原因,导致认定的效力仅适用于个案,难以达到对违法的行政规范性文件进行纠正的效果。为此,必须从附带审查制度建立的初衷出发,对与后续处理相关制度进行改革和完善。要赋予法院对行政规范性文件认定的裁判权,可在裁判结果中以明示方式作出宣布;或由最高院作为提起司法建议的主体,迫使制定机关接受对行政规范性文件修改或废止等的司法建议;并将行政机关对违法规范性文件纠正情况纳入责任追究和考核体系,以促使制定机关对违法行政规范性文件的及时纠正。

Due to the lack of legal binding force of the court’s findings and the lack of enforcement force of judicial recommendations to the enacting organs, the effect of the determination is only applicable to individual case, and is difficult to correct the illegal normative documents. Therefore, we should reform and improve the relevant system of subsequent processing from the original intention of the collateral review system.The court should be given judgment power, which makes an explicit announcement in the result of the judgment;or the Supreme Court, as the main body of judicial proposals, compels the formulating organs to accept judicial proposals such as amendment or abolition of normative documents. At the same time, the administrative organs should incorporate the correction of illegal normative documents into the accountability investigation and assessment system, so as to urge the formulating organs to correct illegal normative documents.